Jump to content

Leaderboard

Popular Content

Showing content with the highest reputation on 08/31/20 in all areas

  1. IGN: YettoDie Reason: After being in almost every PSL, I'm curious to the other side of the table. Got some experience leading some lads back in the day. Other random stuff: Taillow is the best pokemon. Buttbuddy : Forfiter
    29 points
  2. IGN : Jaawax Reason : Player since 2013, not my first PSL, 2 times world cup winner, leader of [SIÂ]. I think this PSL starts off well, and there is no better time to try to be a manager with such a big active community. I have knowledge in every tier (even if dubs is meh), and infinity-ish ressources. Other random stuff : Ah que oui ma bichette
    26 points
  3. Ign: zDaryl Reason: well over getting always same players, would be cool getting surprising ones. so , why not ? :D Other random stuff: i will bring the pain to this psl
    24 points
  4. IGN: Sebat Reason: Playing this game since 2012, as PSL player since PSL 5 or 6, winner in all tiers (and format) and PSL was always some that I would want to get it, but I haven't had the lucky as player, I believe that manager could be different, I have been boss team in majority of my career (LKng, DK, LORD), I know how to manage and relate to a lot of players and lead them to the glory. Other random stuff: I read and understood salary sistem, that adds points right? In honour of my best and favorite manager of all times, @calidubstep
    23 points
  5. IGN: iMat Reason: Other random stuff: wallah im good this time
    21 points
  6. IGN: RealDevilLengend Reason: Last year I managed to build a solid team with spectacular players, I would like to repeat it but winning the PSL since we finished 2nd in the league and lost in the play-off semifinals.I will not choose the players because they are my friends, I will only choose the ones I think are best. Other random stuff: I will win the PSL and give a chance to many players who could not enter the previous ones. Many people asked me to be a manager for this psl or at least to try. I am the leader of HDLM and I have experience in managing teams, 2 psl as a player and 1 as a manager :).
    20 points
  7. IGN: NoWall Reason: I have played 2 psl, in one (PSL XI) we lost a tragic final, i won the PSL XII with the incredible and majestic manager Luke AKA Lucas, i would like to try to win this psl as a manager Other random stuff: Probably get the worst manager of the season award
    17 points
  8. IGN: LeJovi Reason: We created NORE from scratch when nobody believed in us and became the current #1 team in the game. We know what it takes to become a winning team and we're ready to prove that. We'll certainly bring the hype & trash talk which the latest PSLs have certainly needed.. not tryna be another boring season right? Other random stuff: Literally the most handsome black guy in the game. #BlackLivesMatter Assman: LifeStyle You heard the man, he's back and he's hungry. And I'm here to help him. Want Leadership skills? Just point to the team which went 7-0 in Team Tournament finals... and that was only in 14 months. Want Individual Accolades? Just ctrl+f our names in HoF. Want some HYPE? Pick us. #HypestDuo #BlackStyle See he's forum banned but I'm posting for him, like a good assman.
    16 points
  9. IGN: Lotus Reason: I've been playing PSL for the past 4 psls. Every team I'm in I've practically played a co-manager role, supporting the team with building and giving advice on decision making. I've got a lot of experience and knowledge of every tier (besides dubs) and can offer team building help and good practice. I'm also aware of the current playerbase and can gauge skill level well. Primarily when I manage, I want to raise the (low) standard as far as drafting a team goes, and then outgrind the competition. Other random stuff: I will smash Luke.
    16 points
  10. IGN: Imabetheverybest Reason: Won the last 2 PSLs I participated in(refer to the sig). Ask any of these past psl hosts, managers, or greats @Elcoolio @DoctorPBC @Toast @Gunthug @OrangeManiac @Vorred@Kizhaz @Aerun @Fabbroo I am in fact the hype. Carried my team in season 7 all the way to finals (caterpies#1) and never once have been the factor for an activity decision. Pretty knowledgeable on all the tiers/formats and want to give a shot managing. Other random stuff: I got to give @Zigh @OrangeManiac @iJulian a chance to get best doubles players
    15 points
  11. IGN: Havsha Reason: People are whispering me telling me to sign up so here I am. I lost in semis last time I was manager, so I want to get one win under my belt. Other Random Stuff: I'm still going to bring my stubborn managering style of arguing and writing essays so brace yourselves,. Like last time I won't threaten to boycott or leave just because a ruling doesn't go my way, instead you just might have to mute me on the discord.
    15 points
  12. 14 points
  13. IGN: Spaintakula Reason: To avenge the murder of my parents. And to make the best psl team that has ever been. And to get sweet and daryl in the same team. Other random stuff: Most inconsistant psl streaks by season.
    13 points
  14. In addition to my previous post, which stands either way, Garchomp is particularly a difficult, divisive topic. There are a ton of oppions on either side of the argument. It should under NO circumstances be banned because of the votes of 3 smart people, gb and 2 dead guys. What's the point of having a renewed ladder? Using smogon as reference, controversial mons (like most recently cinderace/magearna) are put on the spotlight by the coincil and then it is the playerbase who is allowed to vote. Make a system where the top 100 players of each tier are allowed to vote on the most devisive decisions that concern them. It is that simple. @Kyu
    12 points
  15. IGN: Yungtor Reason: Why not throw my name in the goblet of fire too ORS: Won’t go to jail mid season this time #scoutshonor
    11 points
  16. 11 points
  17. IGN: TiToooo Reason: i play since psl x and I was in 2 finals (f drakos f frag squad). I was the best boss of lord so I have experience managing players i really want to win this competence that motivates me to be manager Other random stuff: guaranteed 2nd place
    9 points
  18. I'd like to volunteer to be a co-manager to anyone interested. This is the first time I'm hearing of PSL and the concept has me hooked. I'd love to be involved with this community and hopefully be there for more PSL's in the future. I'm pretty active and under guidance I'm sure I won't disappoint. The IGN is EricRasp. :) [I understand this thread is only for managers. I apologize if my message is not in the right place :). Just wished to express my interest.]
    8 points
  19. @gbwead Congratulations!, i hope that made you happy, you really deserve it. How long was the wait, the suffering? For months and months I've seen Gbwead suffering, yet still doing his best to show the whole TC the threat that was Garchomp. This filthy broken pokemon was allowed by who? Nothing other than some incompetent TC members who were doing as they pleased, until gbwead finally found a way to bring their madness to an end, a heroic act indeed that shall be remembered by all the people that believed in the truth. You did it Gbwead, you finally did it! I'm happy for you, your sacrificed time wasn't in vain, you have a whole new life now that is Garchomp-less, congratulations once again.
    8 points
  20. I'm pretty sure TC has quite a bunch of applicants (who would be qualified for it), so idk how it only has 6 people and 2 of them don't even know/play this metagame. I also don't know why there isn't a TC for each tier.
    7 points
  21. From team preview you can see that only blissey or chomp can be the rocks. turn 2 it's revealed. turn 3 it shows sd on gliscor's u-turn (Note: at this point garchomp is +0, gliscor chose to stay to u-turn . We also saw that +6 dclaw failed to ko gliscor. Had gliscor chosen to just spam eq instead it wouldv've easily won the 1v1) Also note: a) chucks team has no speed control b) I mentioned how this previous ou reminds me of newer gens ou c) running balance/offense without speed control in newer gens ou is simply a sin. bad teambuilding a + b + c -> With a better build, chuck would've u-turned or teleported out to scarf hydreigh and that would've been it. Chomp is forced out. and even THEN. while chomp got to +6 it only picked up 2 kos and it had to read its opponent thrice to do so (first, staying on gliscors uturn that couldve been an eq, toxic or icefang which would've ended the chomp, second, SDing up on the gliscor's full hp roost, and then EQ'ing gliscor while at +6 to catch the metagross switch in. if gliscor eq'd on either of those turns that was it, chomp is again, gone.) So, recapitulating: chomp faced a team with uturn + teleport but no speed control (bad) , got more or less a free +6 setup by outplaying its opponent not once not twice but three times and even after all of that it only managed to pick 2 kos. I dont think you could've chosen a better example to display why chomp is indeed, not broken. @gbwead @pachima @Munya These are the arguments of your TC LOL: Watch these finals where broken garchomp played vs a bad build, got 10 free turns and yet only managed to ko 2 mons (and to be fair, set up rocks) if anything the game proves their entirelly opposite point and they cant even see it. Give that many free turns to a magearna, kartana, kommomo-o or any of the countless threats gen7 has. Go ahead tell me how well that works out for you. Yet I dont see any smogon TC members using bad gameplay to argue for their bans. oh wait they're actually smart.
    7 points
  22. IGN: Kupokun Reason: I want to be involved in something Garchomp-less, while showing people my awesome leader skills, meet new people & see some spectacular talent, give me something to look forward too. Other random stuff: I like birds.
    7 points
  23. Munya

    September 2020 Tier Changes

    Banned to Ubers: Garchomp Down from OU to UU: Umbreon - 3.60% Usage Wobbuffet - 1.14% Usage Up from NU to UU: Victreebel - 5.59% Usage Blastoise - 5.44% Usage Exeggutor - 5.28% Usage Ambipom - 5.20% Usage Gligar - 5.07 % Usage Whimsicott - 4.64% Usage Down from UU to NU: Ludicolo - 3.91% Usage Rhyperior - 4.32 % Usage Eelektross - 3.69% Usage Discsussion thread: Tier Lists:
    7 points
  24. So, It's finally time! Welcome to PSL XIII. (Hype!) For those who are new or haven't yet read the general rules, please check, https://docs.google.com/document/d/1jrFThqqVDoe_QRs3vzPJxfFzNg4n7EwlV1fVEk0Kkis/edit Now, without further ado, let me introduce you this season's manager sign-up. 1- What are you, as a manager, expected to accomplish? Be present at the time of the auction, or appoint someone who can (Note: We are accepting co-managers in this season. If you wish to select one, make sure to let us know asap after you are elected, until 3 days before the auction starts). Send, to us hosts, their team roster each week, as well as your manager choice at the time. Ensure they, and their players, know and respect all rules stated in the link above. (This includes subbing, buying players, selling players, changing contracts, etc etc) Putting in effort. Both manager and eventual co-manager are not allowed to play. 2- How to apply? Post in this thread under the following format: IGN: Reason: Other random stuff: 3- When is the deadline? 7th of September (12h00 GMT) 4- What then? 8 managers will be selected (Fast, accurately, and unbiased) based on how well they are expected to perform. For this reason, make sure you post a serious appliance. Player sign-up Auction Start of the season. 5- GET HYPED! Also, feel free to express your opinions on already posted sign-ups, or sign-ups you'd be willing to wish in the future. Finally, if there is anything you are not sure about it will work, make sure to contact us hosts. And good luck for those who want to be elected.
    6 points
  25. As the title. I found totally crazy that you (PokeMMO staff) banned a pokemon without any warn in update section of the forum/game, and in the middle of a season. You should warn users in advance, letting them upgrading their strategies and/or teams. And the most important thing, you should do these changes at the start of a new season and not in the middle of it. Just my 2 cents. Let me know what do you think. Thank you in advance.
    6 points
  26. Can anyone explain to me how garchomp got banned in the span from Friday to Sunday (3 days!) when it was barely discussed??? EDIT: @Munya TC is a joke and it needs a reform NOW. It blows my mind that Zebra and Tyrone are allowed to make decisions on a game they haven’t played in years. Another 2 members quit in the past 2 months. Even then, 6 players are NOT enough to make such calls. I know that myself and others have been trying to join for a few months yet you seem to prefer keeping the smallest council ever where 1/3 of the members basically haven’t played Pokémon since generation 3 lmao. (And tbh it’s not like they were ever that good anyways).
    6 points
  27. Your English surely will xddddddd
    6 points
  28. Memeing about Scarf Kingdra in no way addresses Julian's and Life's point as to why that match is a poor example to justify Chomp's ban. If I link a replay to you guys of losing 2 mons to a 0 SpA invested Togekiss, can we get that banned too?
    5 points
  29. Let's see, I'm not going to talk about the garchomp ban or anything, but if for future bans and similar things, as Julián said in things that do not mery quick ban, they should make a vote made by the players with the Best elo and a percentage of Víctor y greater than 75%, so as not to let any inexperienced person give a vote, on the case, why are inactive players members of TC? I think outside of the ban of garchomp or some other, TC members should be active members who are attentive to the change and gameplay of the current meta. I use a translator so sorry if some things cannot be understood.
    5 points
  30. The whole concept of a 6 man TC where 1/3 of the members dont even play is a meme. Even if they did, such a controversial decision on the most played tier should under no ciurcumstances be taken by 6 people. It's all a meme at this point.
    5 points
  31. 5 points
  32. New vanities for people that want to join the unban Garchomp rebellion.
    4 points
  33. Soo, looks like mortals can also encounter and catch shinies, not only Jonulo...
    4 points
  34. AndrewHavsha

    Rich List

    It provides us proletarians with a list of people we must unite to overthrow. Its time to unionize my comrades
    4 points
  35. I agree. It has been discussed on the forum, but still there wasn't any official announcement. For such changes, warning a couple of weeks before is needed.
    3 points
  36. I just wonder how long it takes for devs to remove Swords Dance from Chomp and unban it. Kinda obvious this is the route they'll be taking.
    3 points
  37. The fact that only gbwead is actively discussing with the community shows the TC's deliberate ignorance on an important topic. We all know gbwead's stance on chomp but none of the other TC have even voiced out their rationale when this decision (chomp ban) was made with their input as well. We need a transparent TC that is vocal. Not just a spokesperson while the others operate in the background.
    3 points
  38. I pulled winning teams only, it doesn't tell much, this includes matchmaking. But then I pulled winning teams only from tournaments, i felt like it told a much better story.
    3 points
  39. 3 points
  40. Phase 2 : searching shiny jynx (Mission Completed!!! ) idk encounters 37 OT LussyNL (Alt account)
    3 points
  41. Reform the TC to only have active players. Yw
    3 points
  42. I updated the table with the post dlc wc stats before you replied, same gap, same Clef usage, it now has stats way closer to ours if that satysfies you (300ish games). No go ahead and tell their TC how you are smarter and more knoleadgeable than them in pokemon and how you discover that such a gap in usage proves beyond any reasonable doubts than a pokemon is broken and should be banned. Poor clef!, Im sure it'll be missed once you manage to convince them of your very solid usage based argument :D But thats besides the point. usage does NOT mean that a mon id broken (in tyrogues words). but the fact that TC thinks it does, the fact that you cant make basic assessments based on team preview, the fact that TC has 2 members who dont play the game and 6 total. That is what worries me. It is dissapointing, shameful and you have shown time and time again that you are not qualified to make metagame decisions. Forget garchomp, it is TC who needs a ban/reform. @Munya
    2 points
  43. Garchomp is present in 48.7% of winning Teams in Tournaments, whereas the #2 (Scizor) is at 33.08% (Difference of over 15%). This is a massive difference and indicates beyond any doubt that Garchomp is not balanced at the moment. It's not an easy to interpret piece of statistic, but the message it gives is clear as daylight: Garchomp is broken. Side note: I was one of the 2 TC members who voted against the ban. Personally I would've only complex banned Swords Dance on it immediately, because I agree with the Devs that Ubers shouldn't exist when tools exist to nerf. Also to the people claiming that each TC member needs to be actively participating in public debates to create transparancy, I will just say that's unlikely to happen. Gbwead is being berated in public for his opinion, he has thick skin and can handle himself well. Some TC members do not care to be publically berated for their opinions, which is totally fine as well. They contribute to Tier Council discussions internally and no obligation towards anyone else but Munya/Darkshade and Devs.
    2 points
  44. Paulo300991

    About Garchomp

    Sayonara, Chomp Senpai!
    2 points
  45. I agree that Garchomp is a heavily used and dangerous threat, even without the PvP ability, but from my point of view, I don't see Garchomp as something that is simply too much for OU. I don't see any reason to remove it from the meta, it has its counters pretty well set. postscript: Yes, I know, I was late.
    2 points
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy.