Jump to content
Club Rules & Guidelines:
A User's Guide to Club Moderation
General forum rules

imguridiancity

Members
 View Profile  See their activity

  • Posts

    304

  • Joined

  • Last visited

About imguridiancity

  • Birthday 01/08/1991

Profile Information

  • Gender
    Male

Recent Profile Visitors

1296 profile views

imguridiancity's Achievements

166

Reputation

  1.    DoubleJ reacted to a post in a topic: Best PvP Players & Teams of PokeMMO
  2.    DoubleJ reacted to a post in a topic: International Incident [February 17]
  3. imguridiancity
    The point should be making a better tier, so I would rather have the focus be making a tier where underpowered Pokemon are viable. If a Pokemon is used too much in UU, it affects the viability of other Pokemon. If a Pokemon is used too much in OU, it doesn't affect the viability of UU Pokemon. I'm not playing anyway though, so feel free to trash UU if it makes you feel like you're a Smogon tier leader.
  4. imguridiancity
    If a Pokemon has 10% usage in OU and 11% in UU, why can't it be a UU poke? That's a dumb way of looking at usage-based tiering, and it's why the current system would make a bad UU tier. It makes sense to ban a Pokemon from UU if it's usage in UU is too high, but there's absolutely no reason to ban a Pokemon from UU just because it has passable usage in OU. There's a pretty strong correlation between pokes with decent OU usage and pokes with too-high UU usage, but it's not a guarantee. For example, the former UU physical walls. Also, UU is always going to be a better tier than OU, just because it's easier to ban something from UU if it's overpowered. Just like how Smogon OU is a better tier than Ubers.
  5.    JSTUD reacted to a post in a topic: [LYLE] KingCheerios - Greatest Team of All Time
  6.    DoubleJ reacted to a post in a topic: [LYLE] KingCheerios - Greatest Team of All Time
  7. imguridiancity
    Pfft, it's not brain surgery. Also shit I haven't touched this game in a long time. Been too busy wrecking the TCG.
  8.    DoubleJ reacted to a post in a topic: [LYLE] KingCheerios - Greatest Team of All Time
  9. imguridiancity
    "this is what my sunglasses look like"
  10.    JSTUD reacted to a post in a topic: PokeMMO Super League S2 - Week 4
  11. imguridiancity
    either way he lost winter a clapton of money update on my match, still about to start any minute edit: http://play.pokemonshowdown.com/battle-gen3oubeta-174034259
  12. imguridiancity
    My match with xDGTx should be starting any minute, I'll edit in the link when it does. I'm in a tent on a laptop with my phone tethered for internet, but I'm getting it done.
  13. imguridiancity
    theyre'
  14.    imguridiancity reacted to a post in a topic: [Tournament] General PSL Season 2 Thread - Thug Life won!
  15. imguridiancity
    jesus christ, do you not understand the concept of consistency? It refers to a set of rules that when followed will produce the same result every time. God damn, I can't believe I actually had to explain that. When you go by "well if the bets were kinda high and this match seemed more exciting, and maybe the game was kinda close?" you have a very inconsistent rule, because depending on who's judging it and their mood at that particular time, you can end up with different results. A consistent rule would be one where it's clear who the winner is and doesn't require a discussion or a judge to decide who actually won. edit: thinknice ftw
  16.    imguridiancity reacted to a post in a topic: [Tournament] General PSL Season 2 Thread - Thug Life won!
  17. imguridiancity
    Aww, lil buddy, I don't think you quite understand how quotation marks work. I did create the Underdog award, and laid out the tiebreaking procedure in case two people had the same differential. So the quotation marks there don't quite make sense, but it was a good effort. In the absence of a rule change, it's generally assumed that the old rules hold true. It's also poor form to change the rules midseason, since it can lead to favoritism. But again, not my award not my problem. He could even say "actually, only multiples of 7000 count" but that would be about as dumb as deciding a tiebreaker on subjective criteria. I get how badly you want that shiny rat, but you're being daft.
  18. imguridiancity
    If several people were willing to bet tons of money for the underdog to win, it's honestly not as much of an upset. Last year nobody would bet anything for cody to beat amanu, and there were people offering massive bets for amanu to beat cody. To me, that makes it more of an upset. But that's a dumb way to break a tie anyway, since it's not remotely consistent.
  19. imguridiancity
    Yfw the player who created the underdog award last season and made the rules for it is saying it. Last season for tiebreakers it was "whoever played their match first." That being said, Yangsam donated the ratata this season, so it's up to him. Or ThinkNice, who knows. Makes more sense to stick with the existing rule though.
  20. imguridiancity
    PM'd xDGTx
  21. imguridiancity
    Nope, makarovmaster's win over BurntZebra in week 2 was also a 23k difference, and since it happened first it maintains the lead. Assuming we're following last season's rules at least. I'm not giving away the underdog prize this time so I don't really make the rules.
  22.    JSTUD reacted to a post in a topic: [LYLE] KingCheerios - Greatest Team of All Time
  23. imguridiancity
    We don't usually wear heels like that unless we're trolling for dudes.
  24.    Instagramlol reacted to a post in a topic: [LYLE] KingCheerios - Greatest Team of All Time
  25.    TJXD reacted to a post in a topic: [LYLE] KingCheerios - Greatest Team of All Time
  26.    KingBowser reacted to a post in a topic: [LYLE] KingCheerios - Greatest Team of All Time
  27. imguridiancity
    They finally posted the picture of this sexy beast winning $50.
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy.

  I accept