[请问，闪光精灵改名后对战中不显示前缀闪光吗？]

12分钟前，RNGive 说：

貌似不能了，除非你的不是成品，继续往上孵闪蛋，这样就能变回去了

那真是一件遗憾的事情，已经成品闪了，现在非常后悔改名，相当于削减了闪光宠的前缀特权。

[请问，闪光精灵改名后对战中不显示前缀闪光吗？]

我的闪光精灵没改名之前对战会提示闪光XX使出了abc，我把精灵改了名字后就不显示了。

如果改名不显示前缀，我能否改回初始状态？

[闪蛋孵化原理与理想情况演算]

于2020/3/29 AM11点37分，Zn 说：

看了你的实验，加上其他玩家说的一些推断，我推断出来的应该是这样。
 

1. 只带一个项圈, 锁一个最高, (另一只精灵带了不变石), 剩下五项随机两项最高，两项平均，一项有可能最高也有可能平均。
   例如：4（不变）+4，同3项，4V对性格概率在3成，5V对性格概率在7成；
               3（不变）+4，同2项，3V对性格概率在2成，4V对性格概率在5成，5V对性格概率在3成；    
               2（不变）+3，同1项，2V对性格概率在1.5成，3V对性格概率在4.5成，4V对性格概率在4成。
   这也是我选择2+2错项出3V，再用2V性格手+3V，看出3V性格手还是4V性格手，后面跟我4V错性格（母体2+2出了3V，3+3出了4V）合最省钱最稳的方法。
2. 不携带项圈时, 随机两项个体取最大, 剩下四项其中两项取平均，一项取最大或者平均，一项取最小或者平均或者最大。(没尝试不带项圈)
   （这是根据普通孵蛋时，不带项圈概率会变小，带项圈概率会变高，这种理论推断出来的想法，也符合实际。）

我根据dorybo的理论，选取一个带不变石4+4同3项的情况做了一个枚举，概率是四六开。

但是你和dorybo的理论不太一样，你是“剩下五项随机两项最高，两项平均，一项有可能最高也有可能平均”，这个差异算法就不一样了，毕竟我也不知道谁的说法肯定对。

[Long-Term Effects of Recent Update and Future Suggestions]

57 minutes ago, Raichu4u said:

A volume limit per account of selling doesn't mean anything to people who have multiple accounts.

Multiple accounts is indeed a trouble thing in the current environment. As a player who enjoys the game, I am against the asset transfer between multiple accounts.

[Long-Term Effects of Recent Update and Future Suggestions]

I always think farming benefits(trade with other players) is not the direct factor of inflation. Trading with NPC, which means the currency is overdone, is an important factor of inflation, so why we not choose to limit the volume trading with NPC, and restore the original berry price. That can consume the player's coins, the total amount of money issued can also be controlled.

[5x31 natured dump????]

someone  quitted after the update, expressing dissatisfaction by the way.

[Protest against unpredictable ‘berry cuts']

2 hours ago, CHUCKunso said:

Okay now holy shit, stop all this crying!

In PokeMMO history there have been so many changes that fucked people over way harder than this. Sometimes fewer (RIP TeamUnicorn!), sometimes more players. The change to Yen from mainly Lucky Eggs, most of the breeding changes, etc. We never got something to compensate for it or an early warning, that's how the game works. And to be fair, some of these changes were way more arguable than this one. 

Just adapt and move on!

I can not comment on what happened before I touch this game, but sacrificing player’s vested interests,not potential profit, to balance the game is definitely wrong.

[Protest against unpredictable ‘berry cuts']

58 minutes ago, ShinyAsh said:

Here https://www.nfuonline.com/home/complaints-procedure/

 'The voice of PokeMMO farming'

[Protest against unpredictable ‘berry cuts']

First of all, I lost at least 5M(almost 99*60 seeds, market price $2500->$1500 per unit) in this 'berry cut'.

Officals may think that ’berry cut' can curb potential inflation which is understandable, however that officals chose this  unpredictable update with no transitional period makes me feel terrible. We could have berry consumed at the market price If we were in transitional period, even 1 week, in which we can balance our inventory and cash. I know there is no help to what happened, just protest AGAINST  ‘berry cuts' with pale words.