[What you think about the rules and punishment system? And what can be better?]

5 hours ago, XelaKebert said:

He literally just said the appeal was approved because the user in question was able to prove their innocence. Transparency doesn't fix the fact that the burden of proof is on you to show you did not engage in RMT or botting. How can you say you can't appeal properly when it literally, "Hey I was banned for botting/RMT but I wasn't botting or RMTing. Here's my proof." Then you show your proof. I mean, I literally wrote your ban appeal in 2 sentences, now you need to show proof of your innocence. Desu has already said they won't be showing you anything that would result in giving away capture methods for botting and RMT. This is a standard thing. Never compromise your rule enforcement system because someone is salty about enforcement action taken against them.

He literally just said the SMG showed proof (the screenshot) first, that's why they could prove their innocence. It would be unfair otherwise; how can you proof something you haven't done.

"Hey I was banned for RMT but I wasn't RMTing."
"Okay, show proof you weren't."
"?"
You can't appeal properly in this situation, that's why there always should be transparency in the sense of, you accuse someone you proof it. There should only be a few exceptions, and RMTing definitly can't be one of it. By claiming that "Hey I was [...] botting or RMTing. Here's my proof." is a proper appeal, you ignore that the banned person is not able to show proof.

-

There is a fair point that they can't show everything if there's a risk of exposing capture methods, but that doesn't change the idea of presumption of innocence (Art. 6 ECHR).

Reading this thread really makes me think more people should study law lol.

[Question about money bonuses]

You tell us, you tested it right? lol

[Crying for Amulet Coin]

Let's be real. First of al we only lose 25% of Pokéyen, Pokéyen wich undergoes huge inflation so the purchasing power is rekt. On the long run you make more money, i.e. purchasing power, because of the deflationary charachter of this patch.

[Crying for Amulet Coin]

Maybe make it battle based instead of time based; one can still chill out while running but the item is still consumable

[Crying for Amulet Coin]

It's a multiplayer game, the more consumable items the better for the economy.

[The real problem of PokeMMO's economy.]

First "problem" is inflation of pokéyen and items.

The second problem is that we can put a sell order, but we cannot put up a buy order on GTL. This way mods don't have to put up a restricted price, but the market will create it's own "bottom".

[POKErMMO™]

Put in rake and there's a new money sink.

I would rek everyone in PokerMMO lol

[What time does event end?]

Did it end?

[Mounts]

So you'll mount your follower, and than ride it? That'd be hillarious and great.

[Remove Trade Filter from Global Chat UPVOTE]

Maybe just allow the word "sell" and it might be fine I think.

[Remove Trade Filter from Global Chat UPVOTE]

The people shall vote this up, as this is the leading opinion in Global.