Let's stick to chansey thanks
I'm against a ban.
33% usage is indeed a lot, but in itself it's nowhere near a solid reason to ban it.
Chansey is punished hard and trapped by several pokemon, with some of them mainly relying on chansey (or similiar poke) to properly work (rhydon, haunter, linoone, ursaring). We also have sets made specifically to trap chansey on pokes that would normally have no way to touch it, quite a few.
This makes it, in my opinion a pretty risky pokemon to use.
Chansey doesn't define the meta like snorlax or blissey (to a lesser extent) did, has some big drawbacks and a totally acceptable usage.
It also doesn't affect how viable sp sweepers are that much, there is more to that and it can't really punish them like, let's say, snorlax or even umbreon.
It promotes trapping, but one can simply ditch it for some other pokemon without being essentially crippling it's team like it would have happened with snorlax; it's not THAT good.
If "trapping meta is crap" is the only argument we have, then maybe we should consider banning something different.
Adressing the meta; We've been playing with no significant changes for quite a while, it's only normal that the meta became a bit stagnant.
Nontheless, i see people doing fine with creative or offensive teams at times and i consider that a good result.
The only way i see to spice things up would be to unban something, but is there anything in ubers that coud benefit our current ou? i don't think so, but maybe we could discuss that in another thread.
All i did up here was pretty much bringing back the same old arguments many brought before me so is there really anything else to say before we come to a conclusion? or are we going to blame chansey for everything we consider bad in this tier for even longer?