toxicstrike91 Posted August 6, 2013 Share Posted August 6, 2013 okay, let me start out by saying that this is not about me lacking to catch the pokemon (I caught both snorelaxes at full health with plain pokeballs) its just that some pokemon out there are just UNDESIRED by me. Im suggesting that the pokedex entry be added upon fainting the pokemon. I mean some of the newer gen pokemon are just plain sad, I dont want to have to catch a balloon to get its data, or a pig with a spring hanging out its but for that matter. spare us guys who just dont like certain pokemon the trouble of adding it to our pc yeah I know its "gotta catch em all" but damn do we really have too? I dont like putting turds into cages and mucking up my gold. Link to comment
HotCarl Posted August 6, 2013 Share Posted August 6, 2013 I caught both snorelaxes at full health with plain pokeballs why? Im suggesting that the pokedex entry be added upon fainting the pokemon. no. I dont like putting turds into cages and mucking up my gold. gold? MinyBoy5 1 Link to comment
Fishfist Posted August 6, 2013 Share Posted August 6, 2013 Wont happen. And I dont like it anyway. -1 Link to comment
Sakura Posted August 6, 2013 Share Posted August 6, 2013 -1 Non canon, and not useful. If you don't like a pokemon, but need to catch it for your dex, just release it after. MineWars and IrishSean 2 Link to comment
JWingWangWong Posted August 6, 2013 Share Posted August 6, 2013 This doesn't make sense and unnecessary. Also never was done in any gen. Big minus one. Link to comment
XelaKebert Posted August 6, 2013 Share Posted August 6, 2013 I know its "gotta catch em all" but damn do we really have too? Yes, yes you do. Edit: I dont like putting turds into cages and mucking up my gold. Wouldn't turning turds into gold be alchemy? Besides, why are some of them silver? Link to comment
Quakkz Posted August 6, 2013 Share Posted August 6, 2013 No. I can't believe this suggestion wow... have u even ever played pokemon before? -.- Link to comment
AlbinoDrow Posted August 7, 2013 Share Posted August 7, 2013 But then filling up your pokedex wouldnt be as fulfilling. Rather than saying "I had to catch, evolve, breed, and trade to get a full pokedex" all you would have to do is battle with all the npc trainers for most of them. Then the people who did fill their pokedex to the current possible completion would be cheated out of a bragging right. Tinpen 1 Link to comment
toxicstrike91 Posted August 8, 2013 Author Share Posted August 8, 2013 No. I can't believe this suggestion wow... have u even ever played pokemon before? -.- yup back before a candle with eyes that evolves into a chandelier with eyes was considdered a pokemon. I had the original 150. V-----sorry, I dont know how to double quote Link to comment
toxicstrike91 Posted August 8, 2013 Author Share Posted August 8, 2013 But then filling up your pokedex wouldnt be as fulfilling. Rather than saying "I had to catch, evolve, breed, and trade to get a full pokedex" all you would have to do is battle with all the npc trainers for most of them. Then the people who did fill their pokedex to the current possible completion would be cheated out of a bragging right. well, i just wont simply obtain the stupid ones.(unless theyre useful) Link to comment
Sakura Posted August 8, 2013 Share Posted August 8, 2013 well, i just wont simply obtain the stupid ones.(unless theyre useful) Then just don't catch them. No one is forcing you to fill your dex, but if you want to keep with the "Gotta Catch 'em All" thing, you'll need to actually catch them, otherwise it defeats the purpose of it and becomes too easy. And what about some NPC pokemon that we don't have (Such as Miltank), it just doesn't seem right that you can't obtain a poke but have its data in your dex Link to comment
Recommended Posts