Uroko

Provided Yagami is okay with it the same as Rachel, this contest will have a 1 week long extension, so on Feb 1st at 23:59 GMT it will end. This of course relies on Yagamis post. If people want to enter they could still potentially have a chance.

Added to the second post, And llumii & feeadftth, at least one of your images was found to have copy pasted material in it, in the event of a time extension(if no more entries are posted, or all people that entered agree to it), instead of being DQ'ed, you are being given the opportunity to fix any copy pasted material you may have in your images.

You already know what I think about it, but then again i am not much of a critiquer? i guess.

I don't think you need to be as specific as you might think, there are so many different combinations possible Getting the "right" 31's may not be to bad.

No gender picking would also address some of the this kills teamplay concerns, you would actually potentially benefit from being in a team. I am severely swaying to the other side of this, wish I hadn't supported the gender picking after further thought on it.

Thats fine for the 1x31's but what about the 2x31's, and 3x31's, and 4x31's. In a system where you can litterally predict everything you will need to do why would anybody ever sell these with gender picking?

Prediction: Nobody breeds for a month because they know they can whine when its all over and things will go back, won't work

Short conversation with darkshade. <17:10:42> "Munya": darkshade <17:10:47> "Munya": i changed my mind about gender picking <17:10:48> "Darkshade": ? <17:10:51> "Darkshade": Oh? <17:10:53> "Munya": yes <17:10:54> "Munya": i think that <17:10:58> "Darkshade": On what side? <17:11:00> "Munya": gender being random promotes more trading <17:11:11> "Darkshade": I do too, that's one of the reasons I dislike it <17:12:21> "Munya": With gender picking theres not much of a reason to actually do much trading, at least in the lower tier stuff <17:12:48> "Munya": it would add sort of a value to them, even if its just gender swapping with somebody else

Averages, all stats that aren't directly passed get averaged from the 2 stats of the parents, 31 and 31 average to..... 31~

@admhw/e4, a comp does not have to be 6x31.to be so

Yes I do, if i am in an english channel I expect to see english spoken. Not other languages in an english speaking channel.

That image is a bit decieving, I mean, early 2013 we had like 10 working moves and 300 broken ones.

If they aren't, averaging is probably the better option. Either way, 31's are just the example everybody seems to use.

I disagree, it would just be more difficult.

Braces are actually pretty fair. They are meant to be the costly(gauranteed passing should be costly) of the two options. Average breeding is significantly cheaper. 350k in braces for a 4x31, 750k for a 5x31, prety fair numbers

Indeed it is, and the gender issue is slightly less of an issue with being able to pick your gender breeding, it will end up costing you slightly more but if one of your 31's is on the wrong gender, you could just breed it to the correct gender.

You should do a list of all the different combinations possible, I really wouldn't know where to begin being accurate doing it. What I mean is like, in that test I did. I used 1x31 in Stat 1 16x31 in Stat 2 6x31 in Stat 3 4x31 in Stat3 4x31 in Stat4 1x31 in Stat5 Really the only thing that would be needed is 1, 1, 4, 4, 6, 16 2, 2, 2, 2, 6, 16(if this one is possible) so on so forth. If they can all be figured out then a spreadsheet could be done for each to make sure people never mess up. Maybe not even a spreadsheet but just a very very very specific guide with no real room for failure.

Yeah, i used no dittos when I was doing it, I did assume gender picking at the breeder though. Either way its such a minuscule difference(like 40k) between yours and mine it doesn't matter much. Curious how much gender picking will cost.

Actually, you control all 3, you can guarantee what 3 iv possibiltiies there are in each stat, and you can even gaurantee them down to one possibilitiy without bracing that stat by making sure they both have the same iv in said stat. This is why it is possible to now guarantee getting a 6x31 perfect nature pokemon, if you wanted.

Personally I won't be using dittos unless breeding something that requires it to breed with, not sure why people would, even if they are allowed to breed with themselves(will they be? I saw it mentioned somewhere by somebody but not by a member of staff).

I could potentially still see them being that costly, maybe a little bit more.

Except with catchmmo you couldn't ever gaurantee you would get good pokemon.

Nah, because you don't need the 1x31 right nature to pair up with another 1x31, it doesn't enter until you have a 2x31. I made the same mistake at first, so it isn't a big deal. It should be 1+2+4+8+16+32= 63

this is what I read at first

A perfect nature 6x31 is a little under 3mil in bracers, how much in pokeballs idk. Calculate what people value there time at and they are probably pretty damn valuable. What were they with the old system?