Jehuty Posted August 6, 2013 Share Posted August 6, 2013 This has probably been discussed before, but let's face it, most of the good tags are taken. I am asking for an edit of how the team system should work. E.g. KoG is part of the Xiled Gaming Community, there are many sub clans in KoG. We would all like to have the KoG tag with a different name in the clan so we can still be associated with each other. The Tags are too context sensitive and we cannot all use the KoG tag. It would be awesome if we could all just let the tags be whatever (minus explicit words) without restrictions. Link to comment
XelaKebert Posted August 6, 2013 Share Posted August 6, 2013 This has probably been discussed before, but let's face it, most of the good tags are taken. I am asking for an edit of how the team system should work. E.g. KoG is part of the Xiled Gaming Community, there are many sub clans in KoG. We would all like to have the KoG tag with a different name in the clan so we can still be associated with each other. The Tags are too context sensitive and we cannot all use the KoG tag. It would be awesome if we could all just let the tags be whatever (minus explicit words) without restrictions. Here's an idea, keep the tags the same, but if you are a member of a subclan, it still allows you to speak with members in the main clan in Team Chat. If that's not what you're driving at, could you provide an example of what this would look like? Link to comment
Jehuty Posted August 6, 2013 Author Share Posted August 6, 2013 Here's an idea, keep the tags the same, but if you are a member of a subclan, it still allows you to speak with members in the main clan in Team Chat. If that's not what you're driving at, could you provide an example of what this would look like? Tag Name: KoG Clan name#1 : Old school Clan name#2: darkages and so on. What I am asking for is to be able to use the same tag, even if they didn't have any affiliation. Most of the good tags are already taken and most have been trashed on accounts that no one uses anyways. I want the tags to be similar to COD clantags where we have no restrictions on how many different clans can still use the same tag. Link to comment
GymLeaderGreen Posted August 6, 2013 Share Posted August 6, 2013 Tag Name: KoG Clan name#1 : Old school Clan name#2: darkages and so on. What I am asking for is to be able to use the same tag, even if they didn't have any affiliation. Most of the good tags are already taken and most have been trashed on accounts that no one uses anyways. I want the tags to be similar to COD clantags where we have no restrictions on how many different clans can still use the same tag. Would it not be easier to just combine your guilds under that tag? our tags are our identifying marks, I wouldn't want to see a bunch of scrubs waking around with vvvv next to their name. I'm gonna have to vote against this one, I see your view on this, but on COD you don't have defined teams that everyone in the vast gaming community knows, here you do. Link to comment
Jehuty Posted August 6, 2013 Author Share Posted August 6, 2013 So you are saying a clan that has over 40,000 members that can't use the KoG tag because some other scrub that probably hasn't been online since he has taken it? I don't see how that is fair. Perhaps the clan system should be colour coded when they are apart of your team kind of like how your friends are green, your team should be orange/red etc. There are no good tags left or available, there has to be a better system. Link to comment
LukeBron Posted August 6, 2013 Share Posted August 6, 2013 I do completely agree with this. A single tag, such as KoG, should be able to have numerous drop-downs with the same tag, under different names. It could also be integrated with promotions/demotions into separate clans under the same tag, which would certainly spice things up a little. Jehuty 1 Link to comment
Painist Posted August 6, 2013 Share Posted August 6, 2013 why not just eradicate the older and not active clans so we get names back Link to comment
GymLeaderGreen Posted August 6, 2013 Share Posted August 6, 2013 So you are saying a clan that has over 40,000 members that can't use the KoG tag because some other scrub that probably hasn't been online since he has taken it? I don't see how that is fair. Perhaps the clan system should be colour coded when they are apart of your team kind of like how your friends are green, your team should be orange/red etc. There are no good tags left or available, there has to be a better system. DarkShade has already said that eventually a system will be implemented that deletes inactive teams which would release the team tags. My point, is that something for this issue is already in the works most likely and your idea wouldn't work in PokeMMO. Also, the there is a tag you want but you see someone else with it, kyu has stated that you are allowed to trade in game goods for it if the person is willing to give it up. Another solution to your issue would to maybe suggest upping the max number of players allowed in a clan. Link to comment
Jehuty Posted August 6, 2013 Author Share Posted August 6, 2013 why not just eradicate the older and not active clans so we get names back This option would also work but to be honest it would probably be more difficult to do that as opposed to the original idea. Link to comment
Ssin Posted August 6, 2013 Share Posted August 6, 2013 i would say no to this, for the simple reason of people making an alt, get a tag from a well known team, sign up for a tournament, go there to troll people, making the team look bad, pls dont Link to comment
Sashimi Posted August 6, 2013 Share Posted August 6, 2013 DarkShade has already said that eventually a system will be implemented that deletes inactive teams which would release the team tags. My point, is that something for this issue is already in the works most likely and your idea wouldn't work in PokeMMO. Also, the there is a tag you want but you see someone else with it, kyu has stated that you are allowed to trade in game goods for it if the person is willing to give it up. Another solution to your issue would to maybe suggest upping the max number of players allowed in a clan. LOST shall be revived. Link to comment
Dannnno Posted August 6, 2013 Share Posted August 6, 2013 No. Teams eventually reach a certain notoriety/reputation that is unique to that team. Letting other teams use the same team tag would ruin this. GymLeaderGreen 1 Link to comment
TheBloo Posted August 6, 2013 Share Posted August 6, 2013 So you are saying a clan that has over 40,000 members that can't use the KoG tag because some other scrub that probably hasn't been online since he has taken it? I don't see how that is fair. Perhaps the clan system should be colour coded when they are apart of your team kind of like how your friends are green, your team should be orange/red etc. There are no good tags left or available, there has to be a better system. It is fair. First to claim the tag gets to have it. Link to comment
LukeBron Posted August 6, 2013 Share Posted August 6, 2013 i would say no to this, for the simple reason of people making an alt, get a tag from a well known team, sign up for a tournament, go there to troll people, making the team look bad, pls dont I think the idea is that the person who has the original tag is able to create sub-teams and therefore the only people allowed to use the tag have to go through some sort of hierachy No. Teams eventually reach a certain notoriety/reputation that is unique to that team. Letting other teams use the same team tag would ruin this. I do agree with this to an extent, but I'm not so sure that the tag is necessarily as powerful as the clan name in terms of reputation. People would certainly be able to distinguish between the lower ranks of a clan and the most "notorious" section of it, I'm sure. Link to comment
Dannnno Posted August 6, 2013 Share Posted August 6, 2013 I think the idea is that the person who has the original tag is able to create sub-teams and therefore the only people allowed to use the tag have to go through some sort of hierachy I do agree with this to an extent, but I'm not so sure that the tag is necessarily as powerful as the clan name in terms of reputation. People would certainly be able to distinguish between the lower ranks of a clan and the most "notorious" section of it, I'm sure. I may have misunderstood. Is this suggestion that team tags are not exclusive, or that the original team leader can create sub-teams with the same tag? In the first case I do not support for the reasons stated above, in the second case I'm neutral at best. Link to comment
GymLeaderGreen Posted August 7, 2013 Share Posted August 7, 2013 Original team leader can create sub-teams with the same tag? This wouldn't bother me. At least this way, nobody you dont want having your team tag cant have it. Making them all available to everyone though would be asinine. Link to comment
Munya Posted August 7, 2013 Share Posted August 7, 2013 Team tags should just be done away with as they are now. Link to comment
GymLeaderGreen Posted August 7, 2013 Share Posted August 7, 2013 Team tags should just be done away with as they are now. Why. Link to comment
Munya Posted August 7, 2013 Share Posted August 7, 2013 Because they are pointless, no need to have 2 separate unique identifying tags for a guild. Link to comment
GymLeaderGreen Posted August 7, 2013 Share Posted August 7, 2013 Because they are pointless, no need to have 2 separate unique identifying tags for a guild. What are the 2 Identifying tags? Only visible one is the team tag. Link to comment
Munya Posted August 7, 2013 Share Posted August 7, 2013 What are the 2 Identifying tags? Only visible one is the team tag. So are you suggesting we get rid of the guild name instead of the tags? Link to comment
GymLeaderGreen Posted August 7, 2013 Share Posted August 7, 2013 Guild name isnt a visual identifier. Link to comment
Munya Posted August 7, 2013 Share Posted August 7, 2013 it is still a unique identifier, visible or not. Perhaps it should be made visible. I did say tags as they are now should be removed. Link to comment
Winterbrah Posted August 7, 2013 Share Posted August 7, 2013 Worst suggestion of all time. Link to comment
EricTheGreat Posted August 7, 2013 Share Posted August 7, 2013 no only the alphamales get MISC Link to comment
Recommended Posts