Patrick

Moved to Off Topic.

If you notice that your own or others' posts are not relevant to the thread then you are welcome to report them using the button at the bottom.

This would not reward gameplay, only logging in, much like a reward for "being online for a while" as has been suggested (and rejected) in the past. Locked.

Yeah, currently it is already. (Twistedspoon)

Please post screenshots here: https://forums.pokemmo.eu/index.php?/topic/10313-general-screenshot-megathread/

Over always made the most sense to me. Could be worse, at least you didn't think it was a drinking fountain.

Closing this for impersonation.

We have one of these. https://forums.pokemmo.eu/index.php?/topic/10313-general-screenshot-megathread/

[spoiler]Spot on.[/spoiler]

Moved to Creative Media.

I should clarify,

The name and tag are most likely both taken by an older team. There is not currently a list of available or unavailable names/tags so you will have to just try a few until you get one that hasn't been used yet.

Certain moves are by design able to affect types that their own type usually cannot. They're not an issue and will remain as they are.

Generation 5 skills/abilities won't be introduced while we are still on Generation 3.

This will not be happening. CMs do not need the ability to mute as they are not in-game moderators. If there are abusive users in chat disturbing you, you can do any or all of the following: Inform a staff member via an in-game Support Request, or TeamSpeak, or IRC, and they can investigate and/or notify a GM, and/or Block the player(s), and/or Make a Player Report on the forums.

Yes, we like to run these events and the turnout in-game indicates that it's popular to do so. Expect more in the future!

Yes, and that's exactly why I think it's best "enforced" by the trader. Ask for proof if you think it's required. If they don't supply it, you walk away and don't do the trade.

Why can't traders just ask for proof on high-value stock before making their offers? That is, this suggestion, but enforced case by case by the trader.

Vegemite is not the only condiment that can enhance the flavour of kangaroo meat, you know. [spoiler]I hope you're noting this down.[/spoiler]

This will not be happening. It rewards non-playing and devalues other Pokemon earned by actual play. Also, IVs are static by design, why change that?

Yes, I saw your post, but I don't see how that affects what I said. You don't have to gain EXP on your four-egg-move Pokemon. You're given almost complete control over when they get experience, just not their move choices. So while I see that it could be convenient, I think the other solution where Four Island Daycare gives no experience is a better one.

I'm saying that if EXP gain is removed from Four Island, then I would not support applying this suggestion to the still-functional Cerulean Daycare's EXP gain. That is to say, I think that the "Remove EXP Gain From 4 Island..." suggestion is a better solution, if one is required.

I don't know what you mean. I was saying that the other suggestion would solve the same problem as this one, and other issue(s) that have been raised as convenience issues.

Imagine the exp gain thing happens. You'd have no need for this suggestion, because your breeders aren't leveling up, and therefore aren't learning moves by level up, and therefore aren't losing egg moves. Unless you want to be able to level up with Cerulean Daycare, but in that case, I think there has to be some downside to the "free EXP" offered there.