gbwead

Volt Tackle is the last move.

bump

I saw Ice Punch on TTar, Ice Punch on Feraligatr, U-Turn on Gliscor and Leech Seed on Meganium.

.

Team Name: Chill Captain: gbwead Players: jaawax, lezenor, awaxgoku, princessecaline, jgaw, kamimiii, eastsideboii, Incognition, zMauri Subs: shadow & sebat Cheerleaders: Vehemos & Stelian

xD

@xStarr & @Godhelll I don't want to fuck up your IGN. Please contact me for you reward.

@Huargensy has been removed permanently from the Betting Club.

I apologize. I missed the duels you recorded in week 3. The amount has been updated.

@Huargensy & @skyluxNG, is the situation resolved?

I will give World Cup Media Partners a few days to verify that the following information is correct: @EEdays recorded 14.33 duels and will therefore receive $ 2,974,220. @AngelVRrecorded 81 duels and will therefore receive $ 16,811,712. @Toxicz recorded 23 duels and will therefore receive $ 4,773,696. @skyluxNG recorded 9 duels and will therefore receive $ 1,867,968. @DrakeHope recorded 1 duel and will therefore receive $ 207,552. @Matthzinxl recorded 30 duels and will therefore receive $ 6,226,560 @xMago recorded 6 duels and will therefore receive $ 1,245,312 @xStarr recorded 2 duels and will therefore receive $ 415,104 @Godhelll recorded 1 duels and will therefore receive $ 207,552. The remaining $ 2,421,556 from non recorded duels will be donated to WC7. If I did not make any mistake, I will send out the money in a few days. Please confirm your exact IGN if you want to receive the money by in game mail.

Administrative Notes for Finals World Cup Media Partners (per duel: 10% of the cash prize/179 duels) @EEdays 14.33 Huargensy vs Heichicoda @AngelVR78 + 3 = 81 Aldahirramirez vs Lovesinile Secretplayerz vs Forfour WarriorPast vs Kimiwakuzu @Toxicz 23 @skyluxNG 9 @DrakeHope 1 @Matthzinxl 30 @xMago 5 + 1 = 6 DarkQuiler vs Queest @xStarr 2 @Godhelll 1

Administrative Notes for Semi Finals World Cup Media Partners (per duel: 10% of the cash prize/179 duels) @EEdays 13.33 @AngelVR70 +8 = 78 Flacusaurio vs CarolML NagaHex vs Queest Zhiko vs zZHOplayerZz Frags vs ForFour lManjiro vs kiwikidd aldahirramirez vs smbee xLunethx vs ChronoRike DarkQuiler vs WarwitoX @Toxicz 23 @skyluxNG 9 @DrakeHope 1 @Matthzinxl 29 + 1 = 30 KimiWakuzu vs Enchanteur @xMago 5 @xStarr 2 @Godhelll 1

Administrative Notes for Quarter Finals World Cup Media Partners (per duel: 10% of the cash prize/179 duels) @EEdays 13.33 @AngelVR 59 + 11 = 70 DarQuiler vs Skylux WarwitoX vs killuacuba Aerun vs sannuo TehKharma vs LoveSiNiLe smbee vs shiroecchi Huargensy vs SpartaFS lTear vs ZeknShooter Aldahirramirez vs Gabuchox kiwikidd vs Locoll mkns vs heichicoda TheDH vs Queest @Toxicz 21 + 2 = 23 Sweetforu vs Wolfangt WarriorPast vs DiosdadoCabello @skyluxNG 7 + 2 = 9 Arca vs DRIDRIGOFK ForFour vs Smadagos @DrakeHope 1 @Matthzinxl 25 + 4 = 29 Wallarro vs Zhiko zLithium vs Enchanteur HogniRagnar vs Frags Shentiger vs lKillua @xMago 5 @xStarr 2 @Godhelll 1

My thoughts: WC6 Group Stage was too short. 3 weeks of Round Robin is not enough. I believe a Group Stage structure where more than 50% of each pool goes into the playoffs could be better and would reduce the chances of teams being eliminated after only 2 weeks. There should also be a clear plan when it comes to potential tie breakers in the group stage. A campaign phase in the preseason gives us imo more solid teams for the event overall imo and a better cash prize The term "Mandatory Donator" is confusing, something like "Patriots" would be more appropriate imo. Teams that do not enter the event should only get a portion of their donations back, not 100%. Qualifiers tournaments should be reworked, so they are more flexible. Perhaps a limit of players per team would be a good thing. If there is no limit of players, there should be more than 6/5 duels per week. I personally enjoyed the Snake Draft for the constitution of each group in the Group Stage. I think each Group was pretty balanced imo. Rules regarding substitutions should be more defined going into a season. I personally believe substitution should be limited in some manner, but I'm not sure how. I'm not sure if WC Police / WC Staff is a great structure. I believe it could be reworked in something better. I'm happy with all the duels that got recorded and I hope future hosts will support players that want to record. Rules regarding who records which duel should be clear going into the season to avoid any confusion and having multiple recordings for the same duel. I'm not someone very active on betting threads, but I think the Betting Club reduced the amount of players getting "scammed" compared to other seasons.

PokeMMO World Cup 6 Welcome to the WC6 Feedback Thread. Now that this event is over, I'm opening this thread so players can give their input. This is the place to complain, criticize, appreciate or voice concerns about any aspect of the event that you would like the next host to change, improve or keep. If you agree or disagree with how the World Police handled a situation, if you respect or not any of the host decisions, if you want talk about the behaviour of certain players or just want to underline some format flaws of the event, please feel free to share your thoughts.

Congratulations to Team China for winning World Cup 6. @queest will receive shortly the 1st place cash prize of $ 260,063,467 that he will distribute to the members of his team as he sees fit. Congratulations to Team Peru for their great run in World Cup 6. @xLuneth will receive shortly the 2nd place cash prize of $ 74,303,848 that he will distribute to the member of his team as he sees fit. Thank you to all the players that recorded matches this season. They will each get a portion of the remaining $ 37,151,924 cash prize based on the number of duel they recorded. For each recorded duel, players will receive $ 207,552. More details later.

This is not clear: Special Considerations Quick Bans The tiering policy is contradicting itself, so I think you should edit it to make it more clear. "This applies to all bans & tests, but not quickbans" or "They can circumvent almost all other normal process..." Nidoqueen was quick banned and then we had to wait one and a half month because there could not be any subsequent ban. Venomoth was quick banned, but Medicham got banned 2 weeks later as standard process. Please clarify why the Tiering Policy applied differently in these two situations.

Thank you. Very interesting.

I know I'm annoying and I apologize for that, but could you clarify who is "WE" when you say "We prefer". Are you refering to Developpers, yourself or are you speaking on the behalf of the Azphiel, Huargensy, DoubleJ, iRusher, Axellgor and Awaxgoku? It's important for the community to know who you are refering to because in the future when players make a case for a middle of the month standard ban, they need to know who they need to convince exactly.

That's fine, we don't have to argue about the timing of these changes if you don't want to. However, for the sake of clarity, it would go a long way if you could actually say the words for the record that "Standard Bans can happen mid month". Edit: "what it is now is what it is and how it has been for some time now" These kind of statements are overly cryptic and create more confusion than anything else.

I have a copy of the previous Tiering Policy and I can compare it to the new one that was updated on April 18th, 2023. The only change that was made for Quick Bans that now have to be unanimous. Your personal preferences regarding the timings of potential bans is of no importance. For the past several years, bans have always occured at the end of each month unless it was a quick ban. You can ask @suigin, @pachima, @PoseidonWrath or any previous TC member of the past 5 years, there will all confirm that you never allowed us to vote for standard bans unless it was the end of the month. I am personally fine with the Medicham decision, but your application of the policy changed and therefore you should make an announcement to explain what these changes are. The least you can do is confirm officially that from now on Standard Bans can occur in the middle of the month because that was absolutely not the case before.

Normal bans happen at the end of the month. When I was TC, you would not even allow us to vote unless it was the end of the month. So it is a quick ban and it's actually a good thing if you removed the unanimous requirement for quick bans. Thank you if that is the case.

Medicham got quick banned unanimously?