gbwead

Reminder to TC that, according to the tiering policy, a thread needs to be opened for each pokemon they wish to quick ban. 5 days left before April...

If P2 gets banned again as offensive uber instead of defensive uber, plz fire Munya.

No, you don't.

just because you are a troll in need of attention, it doesn't mean you have to comment on matters that do not concern you

Everything that had to be said was already discussed. There is no point in repeating ourselves. The staff in charge of PvP just need to do their job.

Reminder that OU is horrible. The problems have been described and analyzed. Solutions were presented. Why is nothing being done? Seriously, what is taking so long?

This favors my team, so I am going to say it now so that I don't sound biaised later. A random bracket is more fair. Also, SLSY and Optic are tied, so there is no reason for one to be favored next to the other.

I don't think Devs involvement is required. Instead of announcing what is above/below a specific cutoff point, what should be announced instead is what is close to that specific cutoff point, what could end up above or below. Munya need to allow any TC members to open these threads, it really doesn't have to be him.

I'm assuming the reason is because you don't want players to deliberately manipulate usage statistics by spamming certain mons at the end of each month. This concern is valid when it comes to UU usage because there aren't that many duels and someone could easily manipulate the data. However, when it comes to OU, the amount of duels played each month is so huge that anyone that tries to manipulate usage would cause as much disruption as a drop of water in the ocean. This thread was posted when 15% of the month was not played yet. Every month is just like this one where a big chunk of usage data is disregarded and that's a shame. The reason for that is outdated and it makes little sense for OU usage to not be taken entirely into account when making usage movements.

Semi Finals #WHEREISTHESEMIFINALSTHREAD #Firedogs #DocVsTheWorld #PortugueseJovi? #You talk a big game for someone that helped me make some clown decisions in the draft. I know full well I had no clue who most of the players were and my draft was bad, but your suggestions to get you some teammates were just poop. Godxebec rofl, Behemoth clowned hard during the 1 game he got for me too... then u tried arguing because he is top of UU ladder with a 55% win rate he should play. Like buddy dont ever manage. Also I definitely overpayed for a guy who can potentially go 4-3 If you recorded a PSL duel, please send the raw video file to me so I can upload it to the PSL replays youtube channel. Also join our media group, you get paid! Notes: LC players are encouraged to join the Little Cup Club and take notice of the tier clauses and banlist. If you have any questions, ask your manager or check the general thread. General Thread Regular Season Round Robin PSL Rankings Spreadsheet Stark Tyrants (4) vs (4) Fire Force OU: ForFour Vs zBrann OU: DoubleJ Vs Tawlaa UU: Umbramol Vs CarolML NU: woxiangsinile Vs Pablobacas Dubs: Imabetheverybest Vs RealDevilLegend LC: TheDH Vs WarwitoX DPP: BlueBreath Vs MedichamZ OU: Facursa Vs Heichicoda Kangaskhan's Golden Horde (4) vs My Dress Up Deerling (4) OU: ArtOfKilling Vs Elvessss OU: ZioMOJI Vs Lifestyle UU: Azphiel Vs Onraider NU: AngeloDLZ Vs Luke Dubs: TehKharma Vs Necasintrouble LC: Gasyflour Vs KokenoCastro DPP: Zokuru Vs NikhilR OU: MadaraSixSix Vs TheLpZ Deadline Monday, 6st of March at 9pm GMT Don't forget to PM your opponent ASAP! Post your scheduled battle time in discord at least 10 mins prior to its start. All battles shall be played in Vermillion Channel 4 PC.

Team Name: Yo Player One: Gbwead Player Two: PoseidonWrath

Team Name: Yo Player One: Gbwead Player Two: PoseidonTrash

@Munya Please ask devs to create the PokeMMO Orb. When a pokemon has the PokeMMO Orb equipped as an held item, it will allow this pokemon to use 16 PP of Recover, Rest, Slack Off, etc. and will also block Regenerator from working for the opponent. The PokeMMO Orb would give players a way to still use 16 PP of recovery moves at the high cost of an held item and would also create a counter measure versus Regenerator Pokemons.

P2 was banned as Defensive Uber. P2 has now been significantly nerfed because of the PP reduction. The reason P2 got banned is therefore in question. Considering UU is about to be a shit show anyways, P2 is not going to cause any unecessary disruptions. Talking about overcentralization is irrelevant in this case. P2 was not banned for being overcentralizing, it was banned for being defensive uber, aka being broken. It's also absurd to justify a P2 ban based on speculative overcentralization.

November was prior to the pp nerf. P2 could be pressured more now, it's hard to tell.

march 1st

The priority should be OU. If the plan is for OU to stay atrocious without any changes, UU should be stable enough and testing threats one at a time seems therefore reasonable. If the plan is for OU to change for the better and UU is expected to be affected by the OU changes, it would be pointless to test threats one by one. If the UU meta is about to be disrupted, you might as well test out everything you want to test at the same time.

This is about logic, not semantics. Semantics would be me arguing that Dugtrio is UBER instead of just uncompetitve. It would be arguing that something should be called X instead of Y. Logic is making sure the reason something got banned still applies. I have no idea how you can possibly think this has anything to do with semantics, but I guess claiming this is about semantics will certainly cast a shadow on the fact that you simply hate Dugtrio (like many others which is fine) and are completly emotional when anyone brings up the subject. There is one tiering policy for all tiers. UU doesn't get to play by different rules just because you play UU. Oh something changed regarding PZ? That's interesting. Why is it that when something changes regarding Dugtrio (something like the very reason it got banned), you look the other way? I know PZ should be looked at again and I agree. I just think it's very hypocritical of you to make this argument for PZ, but disregard the same argument when it applied to Dugtrio a couple months ago. Dude just stfu. If you're going to throw personal attacks, you better be prepared to take hits back instead of playing the victim. If a SIA player happens to share the same opinion I do, you label him as brainwashed. If a SIA player doesn't share my opinion, you still label him as brainwashed. I don't know what truth you think you just unveiled, but please ask your psychiatrist for stronger doses.

The reason Dugtrio was banned was because it was trapping Roostless Empoleon in the PorygonZ meta. I disagree with the reasoning for that ban since that reasoning could also apply to OU and yet it wasn't banned in OU (Inconsistency #1). Empoleon and PorygonZ were removed from UU in September. This means Dugtrio should have been unbanned in September (Inconsistency #2). Now, if Empoleon/PZ return to UU, the original reason for the Dugtrio ban would again apply to UU. I still disagree with that reason, but at least the ban reason would again apply. Imo, Inconsistency #1 remains and Inconsistency #2 is gone. Since Inconsistency #2 is gone, I did not ask for Dugtrio to be unbanned this month. I don't know why you have to be a condescending little shit towards Awaxgoku when I have clearly never shared his opinion on UU matters. For over a year, Awax has always been pro PZ in UU even when Empoleon moved up and I have been anti PZ. Just because someone happens to agree with me on one point doesn't make them brainwashed. I would like to point out that you are arguing in very bad faith btw. A couple months ago, when I brought up unbanning Dugtrio from OU for the sake of consistency, you justified the ban with the following post: Now you justify the ban with the following post: A couple of months ago, the ban was no longer justified, but you insisted on keeping the ban regardless because what's done is done, what's proven is proven. Now that the original reason for the ban once again applies, you quickly justified the ban based on that original reason. When the original reason apply, you quote that reason. When the original reason no longer applies, you dodge. That's not how tiering works. Right now, we should probably reconsider the PZ ban because Empoleon is back with Roost. If we were to use the logic you showed when talking about Dugtrio this would not be an option though because: "we have proven PZ banworthy in UU and from that it was banned, it's all that matters, case closed"

Can we get a clear answer from staff about their intentions regarding OU? We have waited for months and we are no where close to have to slightless clue of what is going on. PP Nerf Regenerator

Do something.

According to Bulbapedia, Ditto should copy the weight of the pokemon it transformed into. This doesn't seem to be the case in PokeMMO. I just witnessed a ditto getting hit by a low kick bisharp and it did only 36%. I don't think this is normal.

The changes we are complaining about were implemented despite multiple warnings from the player base. The discussion right now doesn't lead to anything because we have no clue why these changes were implemented in the first place. We need the feedback of whoever was in charge of making those changes. Why did they happen? What did they expect? Do they recognize the changes to our metagame as problems or not? Why our concerns are not taken into account? Are we not communicating them properly? I ask these questions because in order for the discussion to go anywhere we need to know what is going on. Should we discuss ways to convince you that the metagame is problematic? Or are you already convinced and we should discuss potential solutions to these problems? What are the variables?

REGULAR SEASON RANKINGS OVER USED UNDER USED NEVER USED DOUBLES LITTLE CUP DPP