Jump to content

codylramey

Members
  • Posts

    1806
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    2

Posts posted by codylramey

  1. 31 minutes ago, KaynineXL said:
      Hide contents

     

    @BurntZebraWould probably have been more hyped if I didn't watch these theory videos(I had no clue The Hound would live in the state he was in), although it was still pretty cool. I kinda want to stop watching them, turning into spoilers.

     



    It does seem like the most popular theories are the ones to come true.

     

  2.  

     

     

    The episode started beautifully with the stark reunion, it continued to be epic with set ups to a couple of wars, and it ended with an epic scene. Plus we got to see daenerys naked again which is always nice. All around awesome episode.

     

     

    I feel like they need 2 hr episodes, to many things happening at once.

  3. 1 minute ago, DoubleJ said:

    Just not true imo. Ygritte had the better body by far, but I do give credit to Sansa for having that absolutely beautiful face. 

     

      Hide contents

    ygritte ftw tho, you guys realize sansa is like 16 right?

     

    Face is the most important part (inb4 "gay") But srs i never cared about uguu n ass that much. As long as the body isnt too big or too small then a pretty face is all i really looked for in a girl physically. But i think i would take ygritte bc i like strong women. Sansa just ends up being a victim all of the time and makes the stupidest decisions.

     

    Idk how old the character is but the actress is 20.

  4. 3 hours ago, Argorok2017 said:

    I have to agree with Plat on this one. CoD is just going way too deep into the futuristic theme and it's just bleh to me. Battlefield is stepping up though and not following the same path. Nice to see the historical war games still have hype

    I agree that historical wars are better, but America has but so many wars to choose from. Although we probably have more than we should, all of the ones that are worth making a game about has been done and probably will feel like another game that you have played in the past. Which is why going futuristic seems like a good idea.

     

    I think that a good path for these games to take would be what if scenarios. What if china or NK invade a country, or russia starts shit with us (or we start shit with them). OR what if certain scenarios from the past happened. What if the cold war turned into all out war. Or we can do a war that America wasnt even involved in. I believe there are some recent civil wars in Europe that would make a good game (idk much about European history bc #murican) You can get a much better story line out of stuff like that while keeping the limitations of technology of the past or present as an element of the game. I think that thats what most people dont like about the futuristic games, you have so few limitations on your abilities that it becomes hard to relate to the characters and hard to throw yourself into the game.

     

    What i would like to see is for a game to come out and expose some of the wars we got involved in the wrong side of. Make you play as the protagonist but do it in a way that makes you question whether or not you and your country is even on the right side of things. Also a game that really exposes the horrors of war would be nice. I understand these games are just shameless money grabs but someone who wants to make a good war game should do that.

  5. 2 minutes ago, Liberalisme said:

    Yeah I agree that it's too much revolving areound Bliss and Gar but doesn't every metagame has two or three pokemons that are amazing (S rank) and that are too good not to use?

    No idt so, especially in later gens where balance and variety became more possible.

  6. 5 minutes ago, Darkshade said:

    Yes, because it gives the wrong impression to users unfamiliar with the fact that this is the case.

     

    UU/NU currently don't exist, and the game has been changed to reflect that.

    meh tha seems like a poor excuse. The tiers, especially the lower tiers, are constantly changing anyway. Once usage comes in it would be just another change. The only impression that would be made is the impression that you guys and the tier council can make common sense decisions (and i dont mean any disrespect with that line, i just dont know any other way to word my thoughts on this) because this seems like common sense to me. Its an approach that has no notable downside where what we are doing now leaves the UU and NU players out in the cold.

     

    UU/NU currently doesnt exist but it doesnt have to be that way. And honestly dont understand why you guys think it does.

  7. Is there a reason why you guys didnt keep UU and NU the way it was, not allow the items in the tier, and then change it up when we get OU usage? It seems to me like that would have been the best course of action. You dont really need to have tournaments to get in the way of the OU torunies we need to get usage (although having one once in a while would be nice) but at least UU and NU players would still be able to play match making.

×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy.