Atuan Posted July 1, 2013 Share Posted July 1, 2013 Now that we have access to 100% of the movepools, there won't be much difference between the 50's tier and the 100's tier. Specifically, the only differences are Dragonite and Tyranitar. Do we still care enough to stick with this system? I'd see this solving at least one recently created problem - unwanted Daycare levels. So Flat Battles? justicewhale, AmineFifty, guigoz0rd and 1 other 4 Link to comment
ThinkNice Posted July 1, 2013 Share Posted July 1, 2013 Also the endless cry about SkarmBliss will stop, I don't really see why we are staying at 50s. The 'zomg I dont have autism' argument is kinda.... meh, you even have daycare now so you can level 4 Pokémon at a time. Link to comment
Atuan Posted July 1, 2013 Author Share Posted July 1, 2013 Yeah they effectively increased the amount of experience you can get by 280% That's a huge difference. Are walls really that different at the 100's tier? I would think that'd still be a major complaint until Choice Band was added. Link to comment
ThinkNice Posted July 1, 2013 Share Posted July 1, 2013 Yeah they effectively increased the amount of experience you can get by 280% That's a huge difference. Are walls really that different at the 100's tier? I would think that'd still be a major complaint until Choice Band was added. Ttar and Dnite are far more reliable wallbreakers than Nidoking and Charizard for example. It's easier to deal with IMO, also Sand Stream everywhere (annoying but deals with the fking Leftover tanks) Link to comment
Atuan Posted July 1, 2013 Author Share Posted July 1, 2013 Ah, good point. I'm all for weather teams getting more attention and even some Cloud Nine action. Link to comment
Zilox Posted July 1, 2013 Share Posted July 1, 2013 I dunno, it could work. My problem is i dont think i've time to level my 26-30 comps to level 100 .... So unless someone did a leveling service i'd be fucked haha Link to comment
GBush Posted July 1, 2013 Share Posted July 1, 2013 Cross Chop, Psychic, & Hypnosis were just added to Golducks move pool thanks to breeding. With cloud nine its not too bad of a mixed attacker. Link to comment
Atuan Posted July 1, 2013 Author Share Posted July 1, 2013 I dunno, it could work. My problem is i dont think i've time to level my 26-30 comps to level 100 .... So unless someone did a leveling service i'd be fucked haha Well you wouldn't have to. Flat Battle would basically remove the need to level anything beyond EV training and leveling for moves. However, it would probably make sense to penalize anything under level "N", so that going into a fight with a level 30 would hurt you, but accidentally over-leveling a competitor would cease to be a problem. Link to comment
Zilox Posted July 2, 2013 Share Posted July 2, 2013 Oh sry, misunderstood. Go for it please Link to comment
skazord Posted July 2, 2013 Share Posted July 2, 2013 It's still beyond me how they didn't add flat battles, especially with the new matchmaking system (which is pretty much useless, since it adds nothing new, Viridian is still far better) Link to comment
YokoKurama Posted July 2, 2013 Share Posted July 2, 2013 It's still beyond me how they didn't add flat battles, especially with the new matchmaking system (which is pretty much useless, since it adds nothing new, Viridian is still far better) >implying there're still people at viridian I'd rather use the matchmaking system and surf the web or watch something until they match me with someone Link to comment
Plague Posted July 2, 2013 Share Posted July 2, 2013 the only differences are Dragonite and Tyranitar. This. You pulled one leg out from underneath Level 100 Battlers already with breeding in now, might as well pull the other one out too and make everyone's lives easier. In before Level 100 people complain about hours and hours of wasted leveling if this gets implemented Link to comment
Darkshade Posted July 2, 2013 Share Posted July 2, 2013 It's still beyond me how they didn't add flat battles, especially with the new matchmaking system (which is pretty much useless, since it adds nothing new, Viridian is still far better) Because that was just a start on our plans for the matchmaking system. Emlee 1 Link to comment
Munya Posted July 2, 2013 Share Posted July 2, 2013 They had to leave room for improvement, have you guys seen how you act when there aren't updates? It's bad. Link to comment
DopestDope Posted July 2, 2013 Share Posted July 2, 2013 RIP Sunday Night Heavyweights Link to comment
ChrisChris Posted July 2, 2013 Share Posted July 2, 2013 RIP Sunday Night Heavyweights Don't you dare, Dope. Don't you dare... Link to comment
Barrage Posted July 2, 2013 Share Posted July 2, 2013 As much as I hate to see this day come, I think it might be time. I hate Ttar, but I kind of agree. ._. Dannnno 1 Link to comment
Dragosz Posted July 2, 2013 Share Posted July 2, 2013 Also the endless cry about SkarmBliss will stop, I don't really see why we are staying at 50s. The 'zomg I dont have autism' argument is kinda.... meh, you even have daycare now so you can level 4 Pokémon at a time. Kind of off topic but you can level more then 4 Your lead, 5 pokemons via exp share, and 3 pokemons from daycare's (cause you can only put one in the Cerulean's one). But is faster only with your lead and daycare so i understand your point Link to comment
Cubswin0042 Posted July 2, 2013 Share Posted July 2, 2013 So what is a flat battle exactly? Link to comment
Plague Posted July 2, 2013 Share Posted July 2, 2013 So what is a flat battle exactly? When you enter a battle, Pokemon above Level 50 would be temporarily "deleveled" to 50 for the duration of the battle. Link to comment
Quakkz Posted July 2, 2013 Share Posted July 2, 2013 totally support... sick of pokemon being worthless as soon they step one level over 50 :D Link to comment
DoctorPBC Posted July 2, 2013 Share Posted July 2, 2013 Tyranitar and Dragonite gtfo (Tyranitar more specifically, fucking sand whores) Im happy with my 50s the way it is, dont break it for the vast majority of people who enjoy it... not these few who want more people to play with. Tarkin 1 Link to comment
hezeusthewizard Posted July 2, 2013 Share Posted July 2, 2013 I've spent some time lvling 100's. Not as much as some people, but I did my fair share. I'm fully in support of flat battles. Link to comment
skazord Posted July 2, 2013 Share Posted July 2, 2013 Tyranitar and Dragonite gtfo (Tyranitar more specifically, fucking sand whores) Im happy with my 50s the way it is, dont break it for the vast majority of people who enjoy it... not these few who want more people to play with. Because you can't just spam walls and Leftovers recovery? Because good wall breakers would ruin the meta? Pls Link to comment
DoctorPBC Posted July 2, 2013 Share Posted July 2, 2013 Because you can't just spam walls and Leftovers recovery? Because good wall breakers would ruin the meta? Pls im actually one of the few people who uses (and succesfully I might add) sweepers in my 4v4 teams.. I know insane right. Having played pokemon competitively on simulators im telling you tyranitar would ruin this metagame. Go watch a 100s tournament and tell me how many instances you see of a battle not including tyranitar. It will standardize everyones team Dragonite im impartial about, I wouldnt mind either way Tarkin 1 Link to comment
Recommended Posts