Dazuzi
-
Posts
323 -
Joined
-
Last visited
-
Days Won
4
Posts posted by Dazuzi
-
-
1 minute ago, Dibz said:
From my understanding of it, as long as there's no automation or key mirroring involved it should be fine. @awkways and I were having a discussion about that a month or two ago. As Djinn said, you just have to make sure you're manually controlling each character independently, so using your laptop and smartphone should be fine.
Though if multiple accounts are simultaneously logged onto the same device, staff might misinterpret it as automation/mirroring and permaban you. So in my opinion it's best not to risk it.
I am not talking about automation, what I am asking is how the staff views splitting a singular pc into multiple virtual pcs in order to bypass the 1 device 1 client policy. I am aware that playing manually on 2 devices at once is allowed.
3 minutes ago, Dibz said:Keep hunting and you'll get a shiny anyway, so it's just better safe than sorry, right?
I am interested in a clear answer out of my own curiosity, especially since answers such as 'better be safe than sorry' was all that I heard so far, not because I am using this or am planning to abuse what I mentioned for my own benefit in the future.
-
3 hours ago, SecretDjinn said:
Good day BlueNose--As long as all accounts are being manually operated, it is legal. However we do not encourage using multiple accounts on the same device.
Meaning splitting your desktop into multiple ones with a 3rd party program? And if yes do you not encourage it or is it straight up against the rules? I am asking because we had a discussion about this with a friend not long ago and everyone that we asked about it wasn't able to give a clear answer.
-
3 minutes ago, ShinySnorunt said:
Must be your first forum hahaha
3 minutes ago, ShinySnorunt said:but anyway I think you’re right I’ve mixed you up with someone else I believe
-
19 hours ago, BoltBlades12 said:
words
Your whole argument about there being multiple legendaries is meaningless because even if the inconsistent children anime that you're basing your facts on could actually be proven AKA seeing 2 legendaries on screen at once, it would still not mean anything since this game isn't based on them, but rather trying to replicate the OG games into an MMO experience.
It's very clear that you simply want legendaries and are just grasping at straws to make any form of argument, but the reality is, they are gonna be released eventually in their own way, which will be healthier for the game in the long run.
9 hours ago, BoltBlades12 said:I already mentioned multiple Latias, and no it wouldn't ruin gameplay. Besides, this game is FAR from the original.
-Adjusted AI
-Ridiculously Adjusted Shiny Rate
- Inability to get Legendaries currently because they'd "break the game"
The game is not trying to BE the exact same as the original, it took several creative liberties to fit better in an MMO environment, some of which you just listed and if you thought about it rationally for a moment instead of crying 'WHEN LEGENDARIES' once every few weeks, we would have avoided having the same exact conversation for the 6th time. I frankly don't understand why don't you just go and play showdown and/or the original games in an emulator if you are so fixed on having legendaries as soon as possible.
-
37 minutes ago, Minks said:
You can just pay someone else to breed for you, Bestfriends made a video and as a result we have breeders now.
God damnit.
-
1 minute ago, razimove said:
They did that already, didnt fix the money flow still, just nerf it to 0$ to force them to interact player:player, not player:npc.
Looking at the GTL currently, it helped a lot. Nerfing it straight to 0$ is a needless extreme in my opinion, as the goal isn't to have 0 yen generation, there actually needs to be some yen generated to balance the constant influx of assets such as the gift shop tradeables or regular items generated from pickup and such, otherwise the market is just going to go straight into a deflation. Maybe nuking berries to 0$ is what ultimately needs to happen to reach the equilibrium, but I would rather get there progressively, decreasing it little by little and then looking at empiric data for further adjustment if needed, instead of going all in and then hope that it wasn't overdone.
-
2 minutes ago, Raichu4u said:
How would anyone feel about revamping the berry system to be much more passive, need much less attention (in the form of watering), take more time, but yield much less yen?
You can just reduce their NPC price if they produce too much yen, besides, they're already passive enough imo.
-
-
15 minutes ago, Takens said:
yes, i know what you mean, but people in this doesn't know how to build a stable economy this is why we are where we are.
Who do you mean by 'we'? The developers? The player base?
Also, the economy isn't supposed to be static, price fluctuations are a good thing, and the market always stabilizes itself eventually. What you want to do is make the economy half-static, essentially implementing a minimum price limit, yet no maximum price limit, which is frankly idiotic. You can't design the economy to benefit yourself.
12 minutes ago, Takens said:wait so when did gtl selling became a competition?
not posting more in this thing i mean everyone has their own opinion but i don't think we understand fully how to build up our economy and that's why we are having it hard.
It always was, that's what a free market is. I think the correct phrasing would be 'that's why I am having it hard'. Simply lower your prices to the point where they meet the demand and you won't have problems with liquidity/undercutting.
-
-
1 minute ago, Takens said:
not a time restriction just like a way to put a limit price to not lower it from there.
Supply and demand should dictate prices, not yours or anybody's personal feelings.
- JLxKaos, OrangeManiac, KmiKzee and 4 others
-
7
-
7 minutes ago, TheBlueExorcist said:
The problem are the chineses :c they created their Own economy and now everybody here are entering to that
Do you mind explaining this a little further, as if why exactly you think that they are the sole problem?
-
-
2 hours ago, KmiKzee said:
The real problem are persons who sells in stacks of 99 Everstones. Why? Supose that another person called "C" sales an stack of 99 Everstones at 8k. As I have said previously, most of people think that earning monet fast is better than have to wait some time, so another person called "D" will sell another stack of 99 Everstones at 7800y because he doesn't want to wait 1 hour or 2 hours until the Everstones are sold. Here is when the price get stuck. They won't sell it fast, so the price will be stuck for a time between 7.8k and 8k. Here is when another one comes and sells another stack of 99 Everstones at a lower price, so he will stuck more it's price.
The exact same thing would happen if this person lists 1 everstone 99 times in a row though. What you are essentially describing here is constant undercutting, this is due to a) How GTL interface is designed - you can see every single listing and it's specific information as well, and unless you fundamentally change the interface undercutting will always be a thing; and b) Liquidity issues - this is where supply and demand comes in place, if there is a bigger supply, people lower their prices to meet the demand in order to increase liquidity.
2 hours ago, KmiKzee said:The real problem is not that item's price goes down, the real problem are people who sell stacks or a big amount of items at the same time. It's obviously we cant stop people who sell items at lower prices, but we can stop people who sell stacks of items.If we do this, the prices won't get stuck.
Maybe a quantity or time restriction to sell some items will stop this, it can be different for each one of not (because is more easy farm some items than others).
Personally, I don't think introducing GTL restrictions is a good thing, especially if you're suggesting it to benefit your own interest. I believe in the free market without any direct developer interventions. Also, you're essentially just talking about 1 single item and you're using it to generalize it's issues and it just doesn't apply to the economy as a whole.
-
5 hours ago, Bestfriends said:
Let me put you in my shoes, there are people on forums and Discord that tell me that I am not doing enough and people like yourself that call me out for wanting feedback on a part of my performance (I want to know what people think).
You're looking for feedback and simultaneously looking to publicly flaunt your contributions and plug your youtube channel while you're at it and then make an attempt to mask it either with situational gratitude or already mentioned polls. Whether you realize this or not is another topic though, but ignorance is bliss.
5 hours ago, Bestfriends said:Now you could argue that I misread the boom in services, but it seems like a coincidence that at the time I uploaded that self help video, then there was a sudden boom.
Do you realize how narcissistic of you it is to even assume any form of connection between this 'sudden boom' and your self-help video(s)? It's very evident that in your perfect mayoral bubble everything is connected to you and can, therefore, be attributed to you, but the reality is, it simply isn't so.
5 hours ago, Bestfriends said:As for "this and every other thread you make is made for the sole purpose of patting yourself on the back..", let me address this. About a month ago, I wrote an unflattering post about myself that I would rather not say publicly.
Victim card again, also, what do you want me to pity you? I would respect you so much more as a person if you just stood up for yourself instead of just deflecting everything by playing a wounded puppy.
5 hours ago, Bestfriends said:I was planning on constructing another guide, but since you questioned whether or not I am selfless or not, I may make another guide just to prove you wrong. If there is another guide constructed, then you are the only person to thank.
I am going to assume that you meant to say that you weren't going to make another guide, as it makes much more sense. Now, it's not really selfless if you're only doing it to prove me wrong, is it? It's ironically just going to make it seem like you care more about your own ego than the community - your hurt ego would also be the one to thank in this case, not me. You can't really prove selflessness, other than actually being selfless, and that is not at all what you proposed here.
5 hours ago, Bestfriends said:Fortunately for you, I am not the type of person to dig up old posts that you made on the forums and shine a big spotlight on them.
I didn't do any digging at all on you, I just happened to see several of your posts over the last year and I remember them having the same general tone as this one, do feel free to 'expose' me though, however I am not exactly sure what relevance does this have with what we're talking about.
5 hours ago, Bestfriends said:I am not a vindictive person and in fact, I admire your competitive skills. It is nice of you to loan out your competitive pokemon to those that may not have that particular pokemon in their competitive collection.
I am mediocre at best, I am not even a competitive player. I only play PvP occasionally and purely for fun, so I am not sure where you're getting this from. Also, what you are referring to was an experimental concept that I wanted to test out, but it ultimately failed due to a lack of market. Regardless, I feel like I must mention(before you start attributing it to one of your videos), that you had 0 effect on this 'entrepreneurial' attempt of mine whatsoever.
5 hours ago, Bestfriends said:Thank you for your time and have a nice evening.
Ditto.
- Hythalius, JLxKaos, PoseidonWrath and 6 others
-
9
-
-
-
8 hours ago, Diano said:
I'm not sure but if they announced the region this year i guess it will come out around October ~ December 2019.
May be January ~ February 2020.
But i don't think we have to wait years for it.
Note : There is nothing confirmed tho
I frankly don't understand why you're just dropping dates out of your own ass. Just say soonTM so people that don't know better won't fixate on it.
-
13 hours ago, Bestfriends said:
I know that the sentence you quoted may sound like I am touting my own horn, but I would like for you to look at the end of my quote.
13 hours ago, Bestfriends said:I wanted to show my appreciation towards the group behind this endeavour. If anyone took my post as a sign of arrogance, then I did not mean it in that way. This post was to thank the unsung heroes behind the making of this self help video.
Oh please, this and every other thread you make is made for the sole purpose of patting yourself on the back while plugging your god awful youtube channel. Behind all these polls that will never be taken seriously and obnoxious statements that try so hard to make yourself seem selfless and oblivious, there is just a guy who is very self-centered and delusional, and anybody with a brain can see right through it.
Did it ever cross your mind that not everything positive that happens in this community can be attributed to your cringy self-help videos and sometimes people just do stuff regardless of what you do, or were you too busy putting yourself on a pedestal?
Spoiler'Look at all these people that helped ME do a GREAT job!' - Bestfriends
- Fizzinc, BrunoMarin, PoseidonWrath and 10 others
-
11
-
2
-
7 hours ago, DoubleJ said:
Lol the perfect image for this episode.
The screen is dark and full of... I can't see shit!
I don't disagree, but In this case it makes sense at least. Having a short, dark shot meant purely as an ominous intro for a character is fine, but when it's the whole first act and then they throw constant quick cuts into it, that's when it becomes a problem for me.
-
The episode was very predictable and anti-climatic.
In the first act the lighting and camera work was really bad in my opinion, the combination of poor lighting and constant quick cuts made it very hard to actually see what I am looking at, especially during the first mass fight scene. I honestly hope that the NK wasn't just a red herring like Snoke was in TLJ and that they will address him and what Bran was doing in the future.
The cinematography however stepped up big time and there were a couple of beautiful shots in this episode, one I would like to highlight is:
-
You just remade the same thread you post every other month, just instead of being obnoxious and fishing directly as to when the new content is coming out, you went with the indirect route this time.
There is a cornucopia of other games and I hope you will find something that won't make you as anxious, good luck.
-
-
1 hour ago, JLxKaos said:
fml
Mr rares>>>>>>>>>
- GodofKawaii, TomPennyLives, Dibz and 4 others
-
6
-
1
Questions on Simultaneous accounts
in General Discussion
Posted
I heard from multiple people that it's bannable, mainly because of an old post where Desu supposedly said so - I haven't searched for the post, nor seen it, but I heard the same thing from a couple friends and I have no reason to assume that they made it up.
The 1 client per 1 device restriction also seems intentional, but every time we asked the GMs in-game about it, it's always some vague 'we don't encourage it, etc' answer, so at this point I really don't know.