Jump to content
Club Rules & Guidelines:
A User's Guide to Club Moderation
General forum rules

pachima

Members
 View Profile  See their activity

  • Posts

    2675

  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    15

 Content Type 

Posts posted by pachima

    PSL XIII - Week six

    in Competition Archive

    Posted

    2 hours ago, xMago said:

    pq no te cambias el IGN a la cuenta en la que ahora estas jugando? y si sabes la que hablo, con esa en la que andas top en rank ou y en el de nu.

    ya es hora de dejar de dar lástima y que des la cara y no te escondas en la de los demás. 

      Hide contents

    Why don't you change the IGN to the account you are playing with now? And if you know the one I'm talking about, with the one in which you are top in rank ou and in nu.

    It is time to stop giving pity and to show your face and not hide in that of others.

     

    leave my boy junior out of this.

    PSL XIII - Week Seven

    in Competition Archive

    Posted · Edited by pachima

    And we are finally here! On the last week of regular season. Which teams will qualify themselves for playoffs? And who will be eliminated? 7 days left to find out in this week 7. Stay tuned!

     

    #NoSalaryForBlueBreath #FreedPBC #Imabetheverylast #RotomWash=/=Waterloo #Week1-3Zubats #Week4Golbats #Week5-6Crobats #BlazikensRoastedAtNight #MachoBraceDaryl #LeRunFor6th #LeRunFor2nd #PlayoffsHypeSoon #NincadasWithoutRevives!

     

     

    About scheduling matches:

     

     

    ·        Players have 4 days to schedule their battles. If one of the parties fail to respond in that timeframe, proof must be given to the hosts  until the end of Saturday. The team of the player who failed to schedule either tries to get the match done, or they are enforced a sub who is able to play at the requested times.

    o   If no sub is able to play at those times, the other team gets an activity win.

    o   If a sub is able to play at those times, they both must attend the match.

    o   Extensions can be given only once.

     

     

    ·        If both players attempted to schedule their match but are unable to do so by whatever reason (timezones, etc etc). Whoever has the lowest salary is forced to sub. Otherwise both teams are forced to sub.

    ·        Players need to provide at least 3 different times.

     

     

    ·        If no player attempted to schedule a match until the end of Saturday AND if they don't show up to play at the end of the week (Wednesday). Both teams are forced to sub, and an extension is given to the new players. After this sub, any rule stated previously still applies.
     

     

     

     

    If you have any further questions ask your manager or check: https://docs.google.com/document/d/1jrFThqqVDoe_QRs3vzPJxfFzNg4n7EwlV1fVEk0Kkis/edit.

    Regular Season Round Robin: https://challonge.com/pt/psl13

    Team Rankings: https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/1oRYdu7wUT5G1aK7yblDmHbSuq5MBxdycs5BSG-TC2oI/edit#gid=0

     

    Matches can be played from Wednesday November 11th 01:00 GMT until Tuesday November 17th 23:59 GMT
     

     

     

    Sailor Lunatones (1) vs (7) The Ruthless Rotoms  

    OU1: DoubleJ vs Stelian

    OU2: Senjutsuka vs Darker

    UU:  TohnR vs Mkns

    NU: Artemiseta vs Kanicula

    Doubles: Zigh vs AkaruKokuyo

    LC: Aldahirramirez vs DarkQuiler

    M-UU: SweeTforU vs Zennen

    M-LC: Inxss vs AwaxGoku

     

    Empoleon Bonapartists  (5) vs (3) Nincadas With Attitude

    OU1: Schuchty vs CHUCKunso

    OU2: Getovaherez vs Abstractt

    UU: MadaraSixSix vs Umbramol

    NU: Cristi vs Kepzal

    Doubles: Superman vs Aerun

    LC: YeyoXD vs Isperea

    M-Dubs: Badbaarsito vs Halott

    M-LC: Eastsideboy vs MonkeyDmatthew

     

    The Trashtalking Taillows (4) vs (3) Vermilion Villains

    OU1: Pablobacas vs Kiwikidd

    OU2: Endiii vs ZhikoDark

    UU: QuinnW vs Mendeez

    NU: JamesFaul vs JasonSparrow

    Doubles: iJulianFNT vs Rendi

    LC: PoseidonWrath vs Yosoyarca

    M-NU: Wrathend vs Aurumpegasus

    M-Dubs: DocPBC vs Lkrenz

     

    Devil Bats (5) vs (3) Just Blaziken It

    OU1: CristhianArce  vs ZeknShooter

    OU2: ZacMorales vs ZDfire

    UU: Urquidi vs Mlhawk

    NU: Frags vs Tawla

    Doubles: GasaiYunoSan vs Kamowanthere

    LC: KiiritoX vs TheDH

    M-NU: Chopyta vs Kriliin

    M-Dubs: TiToooo vs Lunarck

     

    PSL XIII - Week six

    in Competition Archive

    Posted

    1 minute ago, GasaiYunoSan said:

    Clarifications, I'm not Kuisha, I'm not like that, and it was a good duel, I must admit I was very nervous, I got excited for the first time playing against Julian, I admire you friend.

    Gg Taillows :3

    wdym you are not Sofiik? Everyone I know is Sofiik including myself.

    The tier council needs a revamp because its stuck in 2012

    in Competition Archive

    Posted

    8 minutes ago, DoubleJ said:

    Agree. Discord sniped forum activity with with 360 headshot long ago, but TC does need reform. If there are only a handful of TC members and they still can't get their shit together to vote on a decision we need to find fresh involvement. 

     

    Different TC for each tier has been done before and is effective, although previously any decisions by a lower tier had to be approved by an "overseeing committee" that at times has less information and resulted in a log jam of no activity. If different councils are created, we need to look closely at how.

     

    We also need transparency by devs and sgm's regarding rules TC have when implementing bans, which means we will need to refine the tier policies (again oh God).

     

    We should probably also incentivize TC involvement. Can we make it so TC members have priority in tournaments and possibly even matchmaking? Can we provide them with some form of monthly reward such as monthly RP? 

    It's almost like you wanted a salary system in TC.

    *flees*

    November-Movement Discussion Thread

    in Competition Archive

    Posted · Edited by pachima

    17 minutes ago, Stelian said:

    When there is a referendum in parliament, the citizen who is concerned has the right to know who voted for or against. 
    In the game, players who are affected by a decision have the right to know who voted for or against things that affect them.
    It's called transparency @Munya

    I don't think it matters who voted what for as long as someone come up with a proper explanation for their decisions.

    I am pretty sure there wouldn't be half the complaints there is if Munya or whoever is in charge came up with some paragraphs to reinforce the decision taken.

    If there isn't enough arguments to reinforce such decision then, imo, the situation is way worse than I ever imagined, but I believe this is not the case. 

    If there is, just point them in a separate official post or whatever. Revealing vote names seems unnecessary with this procedure and just allows for free and needlessly trashing in these same forums.

    November-Movement Discussion Thread

    in Competition Archive

    Posted

    5 minutes ago, Stelian said:

    @MunyaI don't understand the ban of Mienfoo. 
    There is a lot of difference between an useful pokemon and a broken pokemon. 
    In the case of Mienfoo in LC, the pokemon is USEFUL, as it keeps the momentum of the game, it can knock off, have a priority, can sd and sub, have a good speed... 

    This fits Uber support characteristics.

    5 minutes ago, Stelian said:

    But, in each team, you have 1, 2, 3 counters to mienfoo ! 

    And this is called centralization.

     

    6 minutes ago, Stelian said:

    But, in each team, you have 1, 2, 3 counters to mienfoo ! It get countered by a lot of poison type 

    Finally this is not true. Sd Mienfoo, for instance, can remove most of those poison types.

     

    The only thing that could eventually go against a mienfoo ban this month is the fact Arena Trap got banned as well. Without AT mienfoo is certainly not the complete insane batshit it was, but after gathering yours and other arguments, I believe it is safe to at least consider it Uber support.

    November-Movement Discussion Thread

    in Competition Archive

    Posted · Edited by pachima

    I don't think people understand what is the issue about sand veil. 

    It's not broken in the uber sense of the word. It's not op in the sense that gives you more wins. In fact, statistically, its crap.

    However, it completely removes any control a player might have over the course of some turns just for the sake of it (And not an added effect, let's say, ice beam freeze), which means its uncompetitive. And please note that being uncompetitive is much different than being broken, and both are not mutually exclusive.

    Ofc the degree of uncompetitiveness is subjective (looking at you gbwead), but please don't come with "broken or not" arguments on an uncompetitive mechanic because it doesn't make sense at all.

×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy.

  I accept