FNTCZ
-
Posts
821 -
Joined
-
Last visited
-
Days Won
2
Posts posted by FNTCZ
-
-
Here.
-
-
3 minutes ago, axx said:
I mean, is working as in Gen VII, bulbapedia just has a weird way to put information incrementally:
Wait. Idk, showdown definitely halves the damage, doesn't it?
-
7 minutes ago, DoubleJ said:
Mostly boosts Foul Play. Can't think of another scenario yet.
It nerfs the damage output of burned mons.
Instead of only halving the attack stat part of the damage equation now it plainly halves the entire thing (base power, item boosts, etc)
8 minutes ago, axx said:Generations III to V
Instead of modifying the Attack stat, a burn now technically halves the damage a burned Pokémon does with physical moves; it still does not reduce damage done by moves that deal direct damage.
Burn now inflicts damage at the end of its turn. If a burned Pokémon knocks out an opponent, it will now take burn damage.
If a burned Pokémon has the Ability Guts, burn's damage reduction is ignored (and its Attack is boosted by Guts).
Fire-type Pokémon can no longer be burned by any method.
Per bulbapedia.
Might aswell go back to 12.5% tick damage then. We're left with a single mechanic that has both gen 3 and gen 7 parts of it, lol.
Not to mention that when calcing we always use gen 7 because that's where all our battle mechanics come from, it makes no sense to back away from that.
-
Just now, axx said:
It's listed under 'Bug fixes' so I'm guessing thats how it works in the late gens?
No, the way it works is definitely halving the attack stat.
-
From the patchnotes: Burn no longer halves the ATTACK stat, but rather halves Physical Damage.
WTF? that's not how it works in the original games, why are the devs messing with the battle mechanics pulling changes out of a hat? @Kyu
-
Damn I asked blue not to put me in this week before even knowing which team we were playing bc I was pretty busy as of late and cba playing r1 of the bottom 4 playoffs. Then I come check this thread and see am vs frags.. I just cannot say no man, that's too hype even for the trash side of playoffs
BRING IT ONNNN @Frag
- PoseidonWrath, yangsam and RysPicz
-
3
-
-
-
24 minutes ago, FNTCZ said:
me vs aerun in 10
I lost, gg.
-
-
-
PSL drama is so boring when it doesn't involve me
-
10 minutes ago, calidubstep said:
None of this happens if bf is comfortably ahead.
Also btw, im sorry but as a host, you cant say this. you're clearly taking a side.
This morning, befor any of this shit went down the voting count was pretty even (130something to 130something) with einstein just slightly ahead.
-
4 minutes ago, calidubstep said:
Tldr: further actions will probably be taken, but whoever ends up with the title, just let the actions it took to get there sink in.
And who will decide which "further actions" are to be taken? you again? lol.
-
1 minute ago, kloneman said:
I mean competitive players make up 80%-90% of the core community, so not sure what you're getting at here.
Im sorry but that is totally wrong and pulled outta nowhere.
-
11 minutes ago, Lvkee said:
@calidubstep I hope the 50+ obvious fake accounts which voted for bestfriends will be removed. As much as I’d like to believe Daryls mum and sister play this game I strongly doubt it..
dw bro we're actually removing the election alltogether
-
9 minutes ago, Darkshade said:
That's not a fake account dude, it says it right there.
tfw im called a fake account :(
-
Just now, WildHodor said:
Actually thats only viable for public or govermental institutions. As private company, organization or any kind of group this is totally legal, if you dont force to vote a certain candidate
Deppends on the country I guess. I was just reading about that just a second ago and in the US it's been recently allowed after the expansion of the fifth amendment to protect corporations in 2012.
In Colombia by contrast (where I live) it applies to all companies, public and private and it's actually quite a big deal every time there's an election
- WildHodor and JonnerTronner
-
2
-
2 minutes ago, JonnerTronner said:
You're forgetting that most people here are voting for the other candidate just for the lulz, either out of spite of BF being a mayor (and because they hate him, disregarding the fact that this 'possible' new mayor may not do ANYTHING at all as a mayor) or just because they are absolutely and completely ignorant of what BF has done for the community and his passion for this game.
why would anyone hate bestfriends??? Hes an innocent soul
-
5 minutes ago, Haazuu said:
@MathewMat and @Dibz were candidates in the preliminar elections, and they took the decision to join forces with Einstein and they start supporting our campaign
Obviously lava members were going vote for Einstein, voting for him is like voting for Matt and DibzAs keys said, they have promoted Einstein him as a team, which is conceptually wrong.
If LifeStyle wanted to be mayor I wouldnt vote for him just because hes my team's leadder. If he joined forces with umom I still wouldnt vote for either of them. and I shouldn't feel like I had no choice on the matter if I wanted to vote any other candidate.
-
8 minutes ago, Masterkeyys said:
do we promote einstein as person ? yes we do ,is our right to do
If we wanna go by law and right terms, it is actually illegal for an organization or group to promote any one candidate to their individual members.
Then again, that's in real life and this is a pokemon game but in my opinion the moral principle can be interpreted the same.
-
14 minutes ago, MathewMat said:
LOL anyone who knows @Goku knows this is LOL
tbh I didnt even know it was gokus ds name, I just knew he was a member from lava and didnt really care who.
15 minutes ago, Quakkz said:implying it happens differently in real politics
It doesn't. But it is wrong, illegal and antidemocratic. one should cast their vote based only on oneselfs views, not anybody elses.
-
Just now, Goku said:
I'm with and vote in favour of my team
And you don't see what's wrong with that sentence?
How much time is left for pts?
in General Discussion
Posted
3