LifeStyle Posted October 10, 2016 Share Posted October 10, 2016 (edited) It looks messy as is with like 200+ Pokemons in it lmao, it would be way better if "Never Used" only showed Pokemons that are above 4.36% usage in NU. Right now based on the latest statistics NU tier should look like (Not in dex order cuz effort): Poliwrath | Raichu | Misdreavus | Absol | Scyther | Grumpig | Kecleon | Victreebel | Electabuzz | Hitmontop | Blastoise | Flareon | Muk | Torkoal | Granbull | Pinsir | Solrock | Bellossom | Fearow | Sharpedo | Venomoth | Shuckle | Walrein | Xatu | Golem | Gligar | Roselia | Golduck | Kadabra | Tropius | Electrode | Tangela | Whiscash | Kingler | Claydol | Rapidash | Shiftry | Magmar | Diglett | Stantler | Kabutops Pokemons that are under 4.36% go to a new section in Pokedex named "Other" or something like that. Please make this happen and don't take 6 months for it, shit couldn't be any easier to implement. Edit: Forgot to add that obviously Pokemons listed in "Other" can be used in NU-UU-OU Edited October 10, 2016 by LifeStyle semjon, Draekyn, Telf and 21 others 24 Link to comment
0 Darkshade Posted October 17, 2016 Share Posted October 17, 2016 15 hours ago, Darkshade said: I don't want to do this, I think that all species within a tier should be viewable at any given time; regardless of how viable people think that they are. People should be able to make that decision for themselves. Link to comment
0 CCMayhem Posted October 17, 2016 Share Posted October 17, 2016 (edited) 3 hours ago, Darkshade said: Makes sense to remove all the LC Pokemon from the tier though since they have a tier of their own and i can only think of two that might be useful or ever used in NU. Edited October 17, 2016 by CCMayhem SirYurop 1 Link to comment
0 LifeStyle Posted October 17, 2016 Author Share Posted October 17, 2016 3 hours ago, CCMayhem said: Makes sense to remove all the LC Pokemon from the tier though since they have a tier of their own and i can only think of two that might be useful or ever used in NU. Logic =/= PokeMMO SirYurop 1 Link to comment
0 Tritios Posted October 17, 2016 Share Posted October 17, 2016 3 hours ago, CCMayhem said: Makes sense to remove all the LC Pokemon from the tier though since they have a tier of their own and i can only think of two that might be useful or ever used in NU. no it does not. just removing the LC pokes from NU wouldn't make sense because LC isnt usage based like the rest of the tiers. 7 hours ago, Darkshade said: I read your first statement again, and it made more sense to me know. But we really need that system you where talking about then. cus i cant make use for the NU-list in the dex atm, its just wayyyy too messy and filled with trash. I remember this being suggested like half a year ago, and it got some positive feedback from some of the higher-ups but ended up being neglected. But cant we get a placeholder in the meantime? i mean getting rid of some of the non-viable pokemons while you build your thing. cuz if i know the devs as good as i think i fo, this feature wont be out next month... Link to comment
0 SweeTforU Posted October 17, 2016 Share Posted October 17, 2016 If pokes that have lower than 4.36% usage considered as NUs, why cant I pick them as a prize for the NU series??? xXBlu3BreathXx and LifeStyle 2 Link to comment
0 Draekyn Posted October 17, 2016 Share Posted October 17, 2016 10 hours ago, Darkshade said: that information should not exist exclusively outside of the game. I feel like this comes up a lot these days, how about those years when basically every useful piece of information regarding officials existed exclusively outside the game? You could simply add a few lines to the ingame FAQ to explain how the tabs in the pokedex work to those people who don't use the forums. Link to comment
0 Raederz Posted October 17, 2016 Share Posted October 17, 2016 37 minutes ago, SweeTforU said: If pokes that have lower than 4.36% usage considered as NUs, why cant I pick them as a prize for the NU series??? Because Nosepass Link to comment
0 epicdavenport Posted October 17, 2016 Share Posted October 17, 2016 On 10/10/2016 at 1:40 PM, TheChampionMike said: Mfw I didnt even notice this. God I suck. More or less :p. Link to comment
0 pachima Posted October 20, 2016 Share Posted October 20, 2016 On 17/10/2016 at 1:26 PM, LifeStyle said: Least you could do tbh is remove shit like Bulbasaur, Caterpie, Pidgey, etc from NU Pfft, how come you underestimate the true power of those? They in Nu create an automatic-win scenario where your opponents laughs so hard that he/she loses by timer. Raederz 1 Link to comment
0 xStarr Posted October 20, 2016 Share Posted October 20, 2016 1 hour ago, pachima said: Pfft, how come you underestimate the true power of those? They in Nu create an automatic-win scenario where your opponents laughs so hard that he/she loses by timer. Don't give out secrets Link to comment
0 LifeStyle Posted October 20, 2016 Author Share Posted October 20, 2016 Logged in today. Looked at Pokedex. Got triggered. Pls fix. Link to comment
Question
LifeStyle
It looks messy as is with like 200+ Pokemons in it lmao, it would be way better if "Never Used" only showed Pokemons that are above 4.36% usage in NU.
Right now based on the latest statistics NU tier should look like (Not in dex order cuz effort):
Poliwrath | Raichu | Misdreavus | Absol | Scyther | Grumpig | Kecleon | Victreebel | Electabuzz | Hitmontop | Blastoise | Flareon | Muk | Torkoal | Granbull | Pinsir | Solrock | Bellossom | Fearow | Sharpedo | Venomoth | Shuckle | Walrein | Xatu | Golem | Gligar | Roselia | Golduck | Kadabra | Tropius | Electrode | Tangela | Whiscash | Kingler | Claydol | Rapidash | Shiftry | Magmar | Diglett | Stantler | Kabutops
Pokemons that are under 4.36% go to a new section in Pokedex named "Other" or something like that.
Please make this happen and don't take 6 months for it, shit couldn't be any easier to implement.
Edit: Forgot to add that obviously Pokemons listed in "Other" can be used in NU-UU-OU
Edited by LifeStyleLink to comment
36 answers to this question
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now