redbluegreen

This is the most riddiculous thing I have ever seen. There is no dmg mechanic in the history of pokemon battling that gives a 1.4 boost:
Sheer Force x1.3 Life Orb x1.3 Hustle x1.5 Choice Band x1.5 Expert Belt x1.2 Torrent x1.5 Guts x1.5 etc. There was absolutely no reason for Sharpness to be added in the first place and now we're going to bend over backward just so this ability stays as relevant as possible. We're going to make shit up now? If that's the case, you're not prepared for the upcoming backlash. Imagine 1.4 is too strong of a boost, what next? We're going to go for a 1.35 boost? What about a 1.37 boost? Or even better a 1.3867556 boost? That would be so neat. Cmon this is insanely dumb.
 
Regardless of if you think Sharpness should be buffed or not, you can't possibly consider making such an absurd random change to the game just for the sake of annoying everyone. No one is asking for this, so why bother? What's the point? You're going to open pandora's box for what? People will start asking for custom nerfs and buffs all the time now. What's going to be next, you're going to nerf Regenerator to 31% instead of 33%?
 
Absurd. Unecessary. Oh and how the hell are we supposed to calc anything with a 1.4 Sharpness boost exactly? I rather have an authentically broken 1.5 Sharpness boost than this degenerate buffoonery of a change. I can't even believe for a second that a TC member suggested this because no respectable pvp player would ever consider something so outrageous. I'm not going to name anyone because I don't want to get in trouble, but you all know who I am thinking about and I got nothing nice to say about that person when it comes to their competence...

Imo it should be the standard to have a vague idea of what a good prize is before hosting a tournament for that tier, if not the tournaments get diluted down by bad prizes and that may stop other staff members from posting tournaments since there's already a lot posted for that specific tier.
 
I understand not every staff member is interested in the comp scene especially for every tier but it doesn't hurt them to ask. Previously when I was more active I've had 3 different staff members reach out to me asking me for a list of which pokemon would be suitable as doubles prizes in order to post the best possible tournaments for the player base. Nowadays with usage readily available and non shiny prizes making the potential prize pool way bigger this should never be an issue.

Imo it should be the standard to have a vague idea of what a good prize is before hosting a tournament for that tier, if not the tournaments get diluted down by bad prizes and that may stop other staff members from posting tournaments since there's already a lot posted for that specific tier.
 
I understand not every staff member is interested in the comp scene especially for every tier but it doesn't hurt them to ask. Previously when I was more active I've had 3 different staff members reach out to me asking me for a list of which pokemon would be suitable as doubles prizes in order to post the best possible tournaments for the player base. Nowadays with usage readily available and non shiny prizes making the potential prize pool way bigger this should never be an issue.

Imo it should be the standard to have a vague idea of what a good prize is before hosting a tournament for that tier, if not the tournaments get diluted down by bad prizes and that may stop other staff members from posting tournaments since there's already a lot posted for that specific tier.
 
I understand not every staff member is interested in the comp scene especially for every tier but it doesn't hurt them to ask. Previously when I was more active I've had 3 different staff members reach out to me asking me for a list of which pokemon would be suitable as doubles prizes in order to post the best possible tournaments for the player base. Nowadays with usage readily available and non shiny prizes making the potential prize pool way bigger this should never be an issue.

I get it. You don't want all the officials to have a shiny prize, it's questionable but understandable. The least a player that won an official for the first time expects is to atleast get a mon that can help him in that tier. But this????? this is the worst prize i've ever seen for any official in my life and i been around for a while... and i don't even play dubs!!

I honestly just wanna know your thought process when deciding prizes like this one fr...

Rename Prof. Oak to Professor Woke while we at it

You really don't want sleep back in doubles. Sleep is a toxic mess of a mechanic which feels annoying to both play with and against both through the amount of turns that the status lasts and the multitude of low accuracy sleep moves. Typically when the community ask for rng mechanics to be banned from competitive (RNG items, bslam lax back in the day) we are met with a resounding no from the devs, but when something like sleep is already seamlessly removed from the metagame do you really want the headache of having it added back? Spore is already a strong move and Amoonguss is already strong, re-enabling sleep clause is not needed and all it would do is open an old and rotten wound that multiple people were campaigning to be removed for years. Yes there is more counterplay against it now than when it got banned but even before that it was on the verge of being removed for a long time. Think carefully about if this is actually something that you think would make the game more fun, competitive or necessary before campaigning for a change like this.

I, Quinn , would like to represent Tokelau as captain for World Cup 6. I consent that PokeMMO staff can confirm that I come from Tokelau .

UwU very cute pokimon :3 

First, I don't understand how an Activity Loss does not count toward your overall record. An Activity Loss is the most uncompetitive thing to do next to coaching/ghosting, and there are actually warnings issued to players for not making it to matches week in and week out. If you have an activity loss, you should be voided from any of the top honors in the season.
 
Also, shout out to @Zymogen for being such a goat that when I haxed him I was propelled to the top 10 of NU.

Basedfriends

Basedfriends

Basedfriends

Bestfriends is 

IGN: Kamowanthere
Time Zone: GMT+3
Tiers: Bench, Dubs

IGN: Zigh
Time Zone (UTC format): UTC+1
Tiers: Doubles
Fluff: I've been bored lately so I'll take it seriously this time. For sure. Pinky promise 
 
 

IGN Zymogen
Timezone GMT
Tiers: NU, UU
 
Disclaimer: Please only buy me as a reserve player. I don't have a lot of time to commit to PSL this season but I'm happy to help with teambuilding and scrimming where I can. Besides, as tradition would have it, I will probably lose if I do play anyway.
 

ING:Babylo
TimeZone:UTC+8
Tiers:NU UU OU 
Fluff:i'm newbie

IGN: Mike
Timezone: No one cares
Tiers: XD
Fluff: If you pick me Ill hold auctions to decide who will play that week

IGN: YettoDie
Timezone: GMT+1 (Amsterdam)
Tiers: All
Fluff: I will most likely stop caring after the draft.

Just wanted to add some reasonings behind my decisions and who I voted for. Going to start off by saying I do not dislike any of the players who signed up as manager and if I did not include you do not take it personally. I tried to be as neutral as I could while voting on subjective matters so hopefully I wasn't too biased. My reasonings are put below in spoilers for anyone who is curious.
 
I'll try to be as transparent as possible with my decisions as I can be for the duration of this PSL. Some of you may dislike me for them but hey at least you know.

Just wanted to add some reasonings behind my decisions and who I voted for. Going to start off by saying I do not dislike any of the players who signed up as manager and if I did not include you do not take it personally. I tried to be as neutral as I could while voting on subjective matters so hopefully I wasn't too biased. My reasonings are put below in spoilers for anyone who is curious.
 
I'll try to be as transparent as possible with my decisions as I can be for the duration of this PSL. Some of you may dislike me for them but hey at least you know.

Just wanted to add some reasonings behind my decisions and who I voted for. Going to start off by saying I do not dislike any of the players who signed up as manager and if I did not include you do not take it personally. I tried to be as neutral as I could while voting on subjective matters so hopefully I wasn't too biased. My reasonings are put below in spoilers for anyone who is curious.
 
I'll try to be as transparent as possible with my decisions as I can be for the duration of this PSL. Some of you may dislike me for them but hey at least you know.

Oh lord I forgot he has a different forum username lmao im dumb

RDL is a manager