TJXD Posted October 10, 2015 Share Posted October 10, 2015 Cant manage this season due to university :/ ..... I'll donate and play definitely though LightLeaks, OrangeManiac, Goldeneyes and 1 other 4 Link to comment
OrangeManiac Posted October 11, 2015 Author Share Posted October 11, 2015 As there was no further support for bo3, the PokeMMO Doubles will be played the usual best of 1 format. Gunthug, DaftCoolio and DoubleJ 3 Link to comment
DoubleJ Posted October 12, 2015 Share Posted October 12, 2015 As there was no further support for bo3, the PokeMMO Doubles will be played the usual best of 1 format. RIP Fred's bribes Link to comment
Gunthug Posted October 12, 2015 Share Posted October 12, 2015 (edited) RIP Fred's bribes and his extremely unconvincing walls of text (at least, the ones specifically regarding bo3 doubles. I'm sure we haven't seen freds last text wall kek) Edited October 12, 2015 by Gunthug Link to comment
Eggplant Posted October 12, 2015 Share Posted October 12, 2015 I mean, I don't necessarily think he was wrong. I just don't think I can win twoce in a row vs someone who's better than me, so i voted against bo3 :^) Vorred and DaftCoolio 2 Link to comment
Gunthug Posted October 12, 2015 Share Posted October 12, 2015 I mean, I don't necessarily think he was wrong. I just don't think I can win twoce in a row vs someone who's better than me, so i voted against bo3 :^) I don't think either side is right or wrong. but he was unconvincing Link to comment
OldKeith Posted October 12, 2015 Share Posted October 12, 2015 Nice job to do this again! I cannot wait to play VGC again. - Week win with under than 4/6 matches won is valued 2 points. A such win can be for example winning 3-2. Wanted to point that this can be extremely abusable by the losing team. I would stick to the classic 3 points per win, 1 per draw, regardless. JayMetaGod and Vorred 2 Link to comment
OrangeManiac Posted October 12, 2015 Author Share Posted October 12, 2015 Wanted to point that this can be extremely abusable by the losing team. I would stick to the classic 3 points per win, 1 per draw, regardless. If there ever is any doubt in purposely avoiding a match, that will be highly punished. I did it mainly to encourage the matches to be done but like everything, this ruling is up to debate. Link to comment
fredrichnietze Posted October 13, 2015 Share Posted October 13, 2015 RIP Fred's bribes kr? makes me cri and his extremely unconvincing walls of text (at least, the ones specifically regarding bo3 doubles. I'm sure we haven't seen freds last text wall kek)yea possibly rip fred too, havent been able to log for days idk why. and yea someday i may write another wall but i doubt it. DoubleJ 1 Link to comment
Gunthug Posted October 13, 2015 Share Posted October 13, 2015 kr? makes me cri yea possibly rip fred too, havent been able to log for days idk why. and yea someday i may write another wall but i doubt it. do vgc Link to comment
fredrichnietze Posted October 13, 2015 Share Posted October 13, 2015 do vgc hell no DoubleJ 1 Link to comment
DoubleJ Posted October 13, 2015 Share Posted October 13, 2015 hell no hahahah we all hate RNG Link to comment
DaftCoolio Posted October 13, 2015 Share Posted October 13, 2015 how i feel about trash talk KaynineXL, Gunthug, xilias and 9 others 12 Link to comment
OldKeith Posted October 13, 2015 Share Posted October 13, 2015 If there ever is any doubt in purposely avoiding a match, that will be highly punished. I did it mainly to encourage the matches to be done but like everything, this ruling is up to debate. I think aiming for all matches being played is great, but I think the rule encourages the opposite. Unless there are drastic measures taken against no-shows, I don't think people will be arsed to play any longer when their team is down 4-0. I am curious what other players/managers feel about this rule. Link to comment
OrangeManiac Posted October 13, 2015 Author Share Posted October 13, 2015 I think aiming for all matches being played is great, but I think the rule encourages the opposite. Unless there are drastic measures taken against no-shows, I don't think people will be arsed to play any longer when their team is down 4-0. I am curious what other players/managers feel about this rule. I mainly thought that when one's team is up 3-2 and they're been the active one throughout the week scheduling then the player could be tempted to play dead for the last remaining bits of the week and it's hard to prove that and punish a guy who has been active for 6/7 days. The rule in my eyes would encourage both winning and losing team to play the game determining match. If the losing team player plays dead it's an activity win for that deciding match so losing team can't purposely stall the winning team either. This of course would not be an issue if everyone followed the "how to schedule a match", but I'm just gonna be realistic and say that most people don't follow it. I don't think has been an issue in the past really, players have been honest and all about PSL but I just found this ruling have pros enough to make it to be justified for a rule. I'm not gonna argue for it any further, if this rule wants to be taken out I don't really mind. DoubleJ and Sleepy 2 Link to comment
Sleepy Posted October 16, 2015 Share Posted October 16, 2015 Or we can all be adults and actually play our damn matches Inarin and Imabetheverybest1 2 Link to comment
Goldeneyes Posted October 16, 2015 Share Posted October 16, 2015 Or we can all be adults and actually play our damn matches ha. Sleepy 1 Link to comment
dedegendut Posted October 17, 2015 Share Posted October 17, 2015 more like imabetheheaviest to carry Bilburt, Vorred, DaftCoolio and 5 others 8 Link to comment
DaftCoolio Posted October 17, 2015 Share Posted October 17, 2015 OOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOO Hassan and Goldeneyes 2 Link to comment
Imabetheverybest1 Posted October 17, 2015 Share Posted October 17, 2015 (edited) more like imabetheheaviest to carry More like dedeIsuck Edited October 17, 2015 by Imabetheverybest1 Link to comment
OrangeManiac Posted October 17, 2015 Author Share Posted October 17, 2015 Oh, so it's starting? Well.. Can we get someone here to shit talk who isn't complete trash at comp? Link to comment
KingBowser Posted October 17, 2015 Share Posted October 17, 2015 (edited) Yo Burnt.....too easy for me, Edited October 17, 2015 by KingBowser KaynineXL, Goldeneyes and RysPicz 3 Link to comment
Toast Posted October 17, 2015 Share Posted October 17, 2015 Oh, so it's starting? Well.. Can we get someone here to shit talk who isn't complete trash at comp? i guess u should leave this thread then Imabetheverybest1, SirAlbert, Hassan and 1 other 4 Link to comment
OrangeManiac Posted October 17, 2015 Author Share Posted October 17, 2015 i guess u should leave this thread then Being good at comp =/= RNGing the shit out of all the possible living things. Link to comment
Recommended Posts