gbwead Posted March 7, 2020 Share Posted March 7, 2020 1 hour ago, DiosSlurpuff said: And ironically, a Nerf is asked to strengthen him further. This is 100% correct. Giving Rough Skin instead of Sand Veil to Garchomp is a buff, not a nerf. DiosSlurpuff and lallo17 2 Link to comment
soyhector Posted March 7, 2020 Share Posted March 7, 2020 (edited) Rough Skin Garchomp would be ultra hyper Cancer. Edited March 7, 2020 by soyhector gbwead and Brianatack7 2 Link to comment
iJulian Posted March 7, 2020 Share Posted March 7, 2020 3 hours ago, gbwead said: This is 100% correct. Giving Rough Skin instead of Sand Veil to Garchomp is a buff, not a nerf. Sure, but the way I see it this is not really about making it stronger or weaker, it's about making it more realiable to play against, more competitive if you will. Kind of the same reason sand veil was once banned from smogon but rough skin never was even if the later was preffered in most builds. You can accomodate and have a gameplan to deal with rough skin garchomp, even moreso if tank sets arise which are arguably less threatening or easier to deal with in a vacum, ofcourse these builds obviously support the team better but as a standalone they are a lesser threat. However, when your ice beam misses garchomp in sand as it goes to +2 that throws your entire gameplan out the window which is what makes dealing with garchomp inconsistent and that is the real problem and what I believe the angle of the discussion is meant to be. LifeStyleNORE, Mineral, Makarovs and 6 others 8 1 Link to comment
Mineral Posted March 7, 2020 Share Posted March 7, 2020 On 3/4/2020 at 8:24 PM, Kyu said: If I had to pick, I think our favorite method of nerfing Garchomp would be to remove its evasion in PvP, effectively giving it no ability. Rough Skin Chomp is still very strong This would probably be the best solution Link to comment
LifeStyleNORE Posted March 7, 2020 Author Share Posted March 7, 2020 11 hours ago, DiosSlurpuff said: I read it several times. I still see you talking about the Pokémon as if it were impossible to counter it. And ironically, a Nerf is asked to strengthen him further. If I am wrong, it would be good to point out my mistake instead of asking me to read again, because I will see the same thing, brother ... greetings. :D That is the complete opposite of what I said, but I guess I'll help you. "Now, all of these sets have their answers, the problem is when those answers lose to luck" I never argued that Chomp is uncounterable, I argued that any possible answers can get thrown out of the window if Sand Veil plays a factor. Evasion is uncompetitive, Sand Veil is Evasion, therefore Sand Veil is uncompetitive. Is it less uncompetitive than something like Double Team or Brightpowder? Sure, but it is uncompetitive nonetheless. I suggested replacing Sand Veil with Rough Skin, because unlike Sand Veil, Rough Skin is NOT UNCOMPETITIVE. And from a game design standpoint, it looks less stupid than disabling the effect of an ability. But at this point I'll take either. Also completely unrelated but for god's sake, that is not how you setup a sig... Ultrajesus 1 Link to comment
LifeStyleNORE Posted March 7, 2020 Author Share Posted March 7, 2020 9 hours ago, soyhector said: Rough Skin Garchomp would be ultra hyper Cancer. Not really Link to comment
gbwead Posted March 7, 2020 Share Posted March 7, 2020 6 hours ago, iJulian said: Sure, but the way I see it this is not really about making it stronger or weaker, it's about making it more realiable to play against, more competitive if you will. Kind of the same reason sand veil was once banned from smogon but rough skin never was even if the later was preffered in most builds. Rough Skin would make Garchomp reliably more broken and broken mons do not favor a more competitive environment. I might be wrong, but when Sand Veil got banned gen 4, I don't think Garchomp got unbanned. It's honestly ridiculous to ask for a sand veil ban/disable/replacement and even more ridduclous to support that idea based on what happened in DPP. 6 hours ago, iJulian said: You can accomodate and have a gameplan to deal with rough skin garchomp, even moreso if tank sets arise which are arguably less threatening or easier to deal with in a vacum, ofcourse these builds obviously support the team better but as a standalone they are a lesser threat. However, when your ice beam misses garchomp in sand as it goes to +2 that throws your entire gameplan out the window which is what makes dealing with garchomp inconsistent and that is the real problem and what I believe the angle of the discussion is meant to be. There are only 2 mons that can wall Garchomp. Mandibuzz and Umbreon. That's it. If you give Garchomp Rough Skin, these two walls will become extremely shaky. Ice Beam walls like P2 and Milotic Flame Orb will consistently lose to Yache Garchomp, so they are not counters, just checks. I think Garchomp is broken. You guys don't think it is. Fine. However, please have some self respect guys; this suggestion is pure madness and should absolutely not be supported or considered. soyhector 1 Link to comment
suigin Posted March 7, 2020 Share Posted March 7, 2020 10 minutes ago, gbwead said: Rough Skin would make Garchomp reliably more broken and broken mons do not favor a more competitive environment. I might be wrong, but when Sand Veil got banned gen 4, I don't think Garchomp got unbanned Because it had no other abilities and because Smogon policies didn't support changing game mechanics unlike ours (lol because baton pass clause totally changed mechanics) gbwead 1 Link to comment
LifeStyleNORE Posted March 7, 2020 Author Share Posted March 7, 2020 6 minutes ago, suigin said: Because it had no other abilities and because Smogon policies didn't support changing game mechanics unlike ours (lol because baton pass clause totally changed mechanics) This. Wtf gbwead... Link to comment
soyhector Posted March 7, 2020 Share Posted March 7, 2020 4 hours ago, LifeStyleNORE said: Not really I saw it like this: It would centralizate the teambuilding. It would be an unhealthy u-turn punisher. Wally playstyle boosted, more 2 hours duel ---> tourneys of 1000000000 hours. Link to comment
LifeStyleNORE Posted March 7, 2020 Author Share Posted March 7, 2020 9 minutes ago, soyhector said: I saw it like this: It would centralizate the teambuilding. It would be an unhealthy u-turn punisher. Wally playstyle boosted, more 2 hours duel ---> tourneys of 1000000000 hours. Lmfao razimove and pachima 2 Link to comment
suigin Posted March 7, 2020 Share Posted March 7, 2020 9 minutes ago, soyhector said: I saw it like this: It would centralizate the teambuilding. It would be an unhealthy u-turn punisher. Wally playstyle boosted, more 2 hours duel ---> tourneys of 1000000000 hours. Bulky chomp was never really a stall staple and even then stall right now is pretty damn unviable. I don't see how punishing U-Turn is unhealthy at all either. About it centralizing teambuilding I don't think it'd have to do with Rough Skin at all. I do agree though that giving it Rough Skin would overall make it stronger. Link to comment
soyhector Posted March 7, 2020 Share Posted March 7, 2020 (edited) 41 minutes ago, suigin said: Bulky chomp was never really a stall staple and even then stall right now is pretty damn unviable. I don't see how punishing U-Turn is unhealthy at all either. About it centralizing teambuilding I don't think it'd have to do with Rough Skin at all. I do agree though that giving it Rough Skin would overall make it stronger. U-turn punishers are not generally unhealthy, im talking about Garchomp like a particular case. By the reason of its type it would be Voltswitch and U-turn punisher at same time, and thanks of its movepool and versatility neither steel pokes have free switch against Garchomp (Fire Blast). I talked about centralizing because using U-turn wont be realiable like now, and for example Darmanitan, Physical Infernape, spinners and probably some other pokes would be harmed. Edited March 7, 2020 by soyhector Link to comment
GaloisField Posted March 7, 2020 Share Posted March 7, 2020 5 minutes ago, soyhector said: using U-turn wont be realiable like now, and for example Darmanitan and Physical Infernape, Tentacruel spinner and probably some other pokes would be harmed. And why is it a bad thing? LifeStyleNORE 1 Link to comment
LifeStyleNORE Posted March 7, 2020 Author Share Posted March 7, 2020 If anything, we need more ways to punish u-turn. Lol Link to comment
soyhector Posted March 7, 2020 Share Posted March 7, 2020 6 minutes ago, GaloisField said: And why is it a bad thing? 5 minutes ago, LifeStyleNORE said: If anything, we need more ways to punish u-turn. Lol Oh god. Why i lost my time explaining? Brianatack7 1 Link to comment
razimove Posted March 8, 2020 Share Posted March 8, 2020 On 3/7/2020 at 5:00 PM, soyhector said: Oh god. Why i lost my time explaining? Pls tell me, how's it so unhealthy again? Make a drawing for us to understand please. But this time include why its unhealthy, not why its good like you did previously. Link to comment
gbwead Posted March 9, 2020 Share Posted March 9, 2020 2 minutes ago, raddevil said: ice shard. done. 252+ Atk Choice Band Mamoswine Ice Shard vs. 0 HP / 0 Def Yache Berry Garchomp: 116-140 (63.3 - 76.5%) -- guaranteed 2HKO Almost done xD Ultrajesus 1 Link to comment
soyhector Posted March 9, 2020 Share Posted March 9, 2020 (edited) 2 hours ago, razimove said: Pls tell me, how's it so unhealthy again? Make a drawing for us to understand please. But this time include why its unhealthy, not why its good like you did previously. I explained it previously, it would centralize and perjudicate offensive playstyle. Please read carefully what I wrote before if you are not going to add new information or discuss something new, so you dont make me waste time. Edited March 9, 2020 by soyhector Link to comment
Sebat Posted March 9, 2020 Share Posted March 9, 2020 I don't know if that its possible but how we have dugtrio with base atk nerfed (by old gen), maybe use the base speed of mega-garchomp on garchomp could be a big nerf, just as option. gbwead, Takens and razimove 3 Link to comment
xXBlu3BreathXx Posted March 9, 2020 Share Posted March 9, 2020 The core issue at hand here is luck. You can argue all you want whether Garchomp is over powered by itself but when you pair it with the ability to dodge it can get out of hand very easily. Lets say you have a Garchomp with a set of: Substitute Swords Dance Earthquake Dragon Claw This set can use substitute 4 times, that is 4 chances it gets a free substitute in the sand, this is pretty brainless to spam with a good payoff when it works. Keep in mind after it gets the substitute it will swords dance without a care then proceed to sweep you because you missed a move that should have hit. But this is just the tip of the iceberg. Garchomp can possibly get lucky enough to dodge moves while behind a substitute or go for a risky kill in the sand if it dodges. This is extremely uncompetitive and leaves the other player feeling that it was out of their control. Now we all know moves can miss but those moves usually have significant upsides like huge base power or good secondary traits, sand veil makes every move (apart from garbage moves that state they will hit without fail e.g. aerial ace) the opponent makes have a chance to miss. I would like to talk about sand briefly here because it is was enables sand veil to work. We have two sand stream setters in OU which are both good being Tyranitar and Hippowdon. It is a fair assumption to make that with 13.8% (Tyranitar) and 7.25% (Hippowdon) usage you will encounter sand setters roughly 1/5 to 1/6 games by your opponent. What I am trying to say here is sand veil has a very reasonable chance to be active in a duel especially if you bring your own setter to initiate it. I think removing or swapping sand veil would be the best course of action to balance Garchomp. Makarovs, LifeStyleNORE and suigin 2 1 Link to comment
Rache Posted March 9, 2020 Share Posted March 9, 2020 Locked by request. LifeStyleNORE and gbwead 2 Link to comment
Recommended Posts